Volume > Issue > The Obsolescence of Left & Right

The Obsolescence of Left & Right


By Christopher Lasch | April 1989
Christopher Lasch is Watson Professor of History at the University of Rochester. This academic year he is on sabbatical as a Fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences in Stanford, California. His books in­clude Haven in a Heartless World, The Culture of Narcissism, and The Minimal Self. He is the father of four children and a Contributing Editor of the NEW OXFORD REVIEW. The above article is adapted from his forthcoming book on prog­ress and its critics, to be published by Norton next year. Copyright © 1989 Christopher Lasch.

The unexpected resurgence of the political right, not only in the United States but throughout much of the Western world, has thrown the left in­to confusion and called into question all its old as­sumptions about the future: that the course of his­tory favored the left; that the right would never re­cover from the defeats it suffered during the era of liberal and social democratic ascendancy; that some form of socialism, at the very least a more vigorous form of the welfare state, would soon re­place free-market capitalism. Who would have pre­dicted 25 years ago that, as the 20th century ap­proached its end, it would be the left that was ev­erywhere in retreat?

But the characteristic mood of the times, a baffled sense of drift, is by no means confined to people on the left. The unanticipated success of the right has not restored moral order and collec­tive purpose to Western nations, least of all to the U.S. The new right came to power with a mandate not just to free the market from bureaucratic interference but to halt the slide into apathy, hedonism, and moral chaos. It has not lived up to expecta­tions. Spiritual disrepair, the perception of which furnished much of the popular animus against lib­eralism, is just as evident today as it was in the 1970s.

Conservative contributors to a recent sympos­ium on the state of American conservatism report widespread “discouragement” with the accomplish­ments of the Reagan revolution, so called. Like lib­erals, conservatives suffer from “demoralization” and “malaise.” According to George Panichas, the “crisis of modernity” remains unresolved by a “sham conservatism” that merely sanctions the un­bridled pursuit of worldly success. Clyde Wilson writes that the “everyday virtues of honesty, loyal­ty, manners, work, and restraint” are more “atten­uated” than ever. In the early 1960s it was still “possible to take for granted that the social fabric of the West…was relatively intact.” Under Rea­gan, however, it continued to unravel.

Ritual deference to “traditional values” can­not hide the right’s commitment to progress, un­limited economic growth, and acquisitive individu­alism. Conservatives Paul Gottfried and Thomas Fleming point out that the goal of “unlimited ma­terial opportunity and social improvement” plays a much larger part in contemporary conservatism than a defense of tradition. “Skepticism about progress,” once the hallmark of conservative intellectuals, has all but disappeared. “Political differ­ences between right and left have by now been large­ly reduced to disagreements over policies designed to achieve comparable…goals.” The ideological distinctions between liberalism and conservatism have become increasingly obscure. The old categor­ies no longer define the lines of political debate.

Enjoyed reading this?



You May Also Enjoy

Anarchists in Chicago

The dominant liberal-progressive historians of the past 100 years have "photoshopped" the Haymarket event into their picture of America as an intolerant plutocracy.

Base Communities

Communidades de base is the Spanish phrase for something that has been hailed as a…

On Michael Novak's Democratic Capitalism

Can the destructive side of the capitalist growth process be mitigated while doing minimal damage to the creative side?