From the Narthex
Farewell to the Pocket Paperback
By John M. Grondelski
We are constantly flooded with stimuli — so much so that we often fail to notice when seemingly unrelated developments share a common logic. Consider two recent pieces in The New York Times. In one, Oren Cass criticizes what he calls “financialization”: an economy increasingly devoted not to producing goods but to extracting value through layers of financial manipulation. In another, Elizabeth Harris laments the quiet disappearance of the mass-market paperback book.
At first glance, these topics appear to inhabit different realms. Yet they are symptoms of the same underlying shift: When institutions prioritize margin over mission, accessibility tends to suffer.
Let’s consider the second development, though the first helps illuminate it. The decline of the pocket paperback is not merely a publishing curiosity. It raises a larger question: What kind of reading culture are we prepared to sustain?
Those of us old enough can remember when “reading” meant taking a thing made of paper into our hands, opening it, and turning the pages of what was called a “book.” Those who recall that artifact probably also remember the cheap paperbacks available for $1.99 or so on drugstore racks and elsewhere. (In my boyhood, many were less than a buck.)
You May Also Enjoy
Life in the U.S.A. gives off mixed signals. T.V. religion has taken a pratfall, and…
The principal means of teaching in the medieval university was not the classroom lecture but the quaestio disputata (disputed question).
Had they met, the English writer and the French philosopher would have had an interesting exchange of ideas over a nice cup of tea.