Volume > Issue > What Is the Purpose of Poetry?

What Is the Purpose of Poetry?

A CONVERSATION WITH CAITLIN SMITH GILSON

By Cicero Bruce | April 2024
Cicero Bruce is Professor of English at Dalton State College in Georgia. He is the author of W.H. Auden’s Moral Imagination and the introduction to the new edition of Crowd Culture: An Examination of the American Way of Life by Bernard Iddings Bell.

Caitlin Smith Gilson is professor of philosophy at University of Holy Cross in New Orleans and visiting professor of philosophy at Pontificia Università della Santa Croce in Rome. She is the author of eight books of Catholic theology, Christian philosophy, and religious poetry. Herein we discuss her latest volume of verse, Rhapsody and Redolence: The Crystal Decade, a cycle of religious poetry and art, co-written with Carol Scott, an award-winning artist and professor emeritus of art at University of Holy Cross.

NOR: In today’s educational milieu, it seems that poetry, particularly religious poetry, is either made a cadaver onto which cultural theorists impose an ideology or seen as mere ornamentation with no value in a world socially determined by economic utility and bottom lines. Poetry was once understood to be an anthropological episteme, a way of knowing, if only through a glass darkly. It was seen, even in the blind but percipient eyes of Homer, as a mimetic art representing the truth of our nature in relation to supernature.

Caitlin Smith Gilson: Such an understanding of poetry, and of philosophy, too, as a way of knowing ourselves sub specie aeternitatis (from the perspective of the eternal), has been, for some time now, in decline. For this reason, there are few thinkers these days in academia, and even fewer poets.

The word philosophy (love of wisdom) is used with ubiquity, but its contradictory pole, philodoxa (love of opinion), is not. Isn’t that a reason to pause? What we call thought, philosophy, and poetry, having lost the demands of Being, having lost Truth, Goodness, and Beauty, have always necessitated more than instantiations of ego, more than the emotivist sentiment, and are the many shades of the unspoken philodoxa. In the land of the ontologically impercipient, we would be fortunate if the one-eyed man is king, for the blind are leading the blind in “higher” education.

NOR: The notion of leading through literature, however, is a vital cultural function. It is as old as Aesop, whose fables are nothing if not maps for the moral imagination. I once opined at a faculty discussion of educational aims that poetry is to science what a mother is to a child. A child is naturally curious but dangerously reckless if his course is not gently directed — or redirected.

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

“The Body-Snatcher.” By Robert Louis Stevenson.

A certain scientific consequentialism claims that the “end” of medical experimentation (the advancement of science) justifies any “means.”

Time & Certainty: Jane Austen & René Descartes Have Tea

Had they met, the English writer and the French philosopher would have had an interesting exchange of ideas over a nice cup of tea.

Women's Revenge: To Torture Without Guilt

Literature offers many examples highlighting the fact that, in very subtle ways, men can be victimized -- even “tortured” -- by the fair sex.