Volume > Issue > The Theology of Dance

The Theology of Dance

GUEST COLUMN

By Joseph Cornwall | March 2016
Joseph Cornwall and his wife, Denise, raised their family in Providence, Rhode Island, where he practices architecture and she paints. They have four children and a grandchild.

There are over thirty references to dance and dancing in the Bible. Dancing is always an expression of delight, though not always an expression of God’s pleasure. When the Jews flee Egypt and are safely removed from the grip of Pharaoh, Miriam utters the first scriptural song of verse and rejoices by dancing with timbrel in hand. All too soon this dancing in God’s joy gives way to dancing before the idol of the golden calf. Centuries later, King David astounds and delights with his victory dance into conquered Jerusalem. Centuries after that comes the haunting contrast of Isaiah’s vision of satyrs dancing in fallen Babylon.

Since biblical times, traditional and folk dancing have codified forms of communal dancing. Mazurkas, Morris dancing, and Yiddish dancing are examples of dances to celebrate marriage and feast days in a manner that gives rise to the joy of the occasion without excess sensuality. These types of communal dancing preserve a truly human activity for the good of the whole without veering into prurience.

More recently, we have seen the development of partner dancing — ballroom, Latin, swing, and country, to name a few. Partner dancing exists between the extremes of erotic dancing on the one hand and communal dancing on the other. Though it is sensuous, it has strict rules and formats. If we stop to consider partner dancing, it offers insights into the relationship between men and women. In fact, partner dancing gives artistic expression to a primal, foundational relationship: God created man in His own image, male and female he created them.

For the newcomer to partner dancing, it can be jarring to learn that men always lead and women always follow. The cultural ether in which we move offers no clue that modern women heartily submit to this condition. In the tired jargon of our day, one would think it is profoundly sexist. Yet the terms for violating this rule, “back leading” and “hijacking,” speak to its strong proscription.

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! GET A FREE 7 DAY TRIAL

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

You May Also Enjoy

Letter to the Editor: January-February 1995

The Link Between War & Sexual License... What About the Children?... Don't Call Me a Victim... Ultramontane Calumnies...

Quo Vadis, Catholic Higher Education?

For those who have spent the past two decades working toward the implementation of Ex…

Why Don't People Read the Spiritual Classics?

Show me a classic and I’ll show you a book few people read unless they’re…