The Crisis of Anglo-Catholicism in England
TO FIND & RESCUE THE ONE LOST SHEEP
The November 11, 1992, vote of the General Synod of the Church of England to admit women to the priesthood (ratified by Parliament and Crown and put into effect by the actions of the Bishop of Bristol on March 12, 1994) certainly raises a serious obstacle in ecumenical relations between the Church of England and the Church of Rome, if in fact it does not spell the end of any hope for ultimate reunion. It is all the more tragic because Anglican-Catholic rapprochement is such a relatively recent phenomenon.
It seemed that the Act of Settlement (1701) not only precluded a Catholic from becoming king of England, but also effectively ended any consideration of a reunion of Canterbury with Rome. It was not until the middle of the 19th century that serious thought was again given on both sides to the question of reunion. The Tractarians developed their ecclesiological thought in the direction of unity with Rome (or in some cases with Eastern Orthodoxy). Yet the relative weakness of their position — small numbers, embroilment in “ritualist” controversies, and the accession of many of their leaders to Rome — produced few immediate results. Similarly, the nascent Association for the Promotion of the Unity of Christendom, founded in 1857 to encourage Anglicans, Catholics, and Orthodox to pray daily for unity, was condemned by the Holy Office in 1864, and the Catholic participants were forced to withdraw. More ambitious schemes for partial union had almost no success, more often floundering in shadowy intrigues, like the debacle of the Order of Corporate Reunion (1877-1883). In succeeding years anxiety, occasioned no doubt by the still tenuous position of the Catholic Church in England, led the Church to adopt a strategy of counter-offensive. What has been called a “conversion mentality” informed the attempt to swamp the union-minded Anglo-Catholic movement and draw its leaders into the Catholic Church. The culmination of this effort was Leo XIII’s condemnation of Anglican Orders in his bull Apostolicae Curae (1896). With Anglican Orders declared “absolutely null and utterly void,” it was thought that the Anglo-Catholics would have no choice but to jump ship for Rome, as some did. Any more meaningful ecumenical conversations, though, would have to await the 20th century.
And this indeed has been the century for dialogue. From the Malines conferences (1921-1925) to ARCIC-II (1982- ), the Anglican and Catholic churches have carried on extensive theological discussions, particularly after Vatican II. Despite the optimistic tone of Pope Paul VI and Archbishop Michael Ramsey as they inaugurated ARCIC (Anglican/Roman Catholic International Commission), these talks have not produced the hoped-for results. Those hopes were predicated on coming to some common formulation of a Catholic faith “founded on the Gospels and on the ancient common traditions” and already held by both sides. But if the inherent contradictions of Anglicanism had not already damned the project, then certainly the 1991 selection of George Carey as Archbishop of Canterbury, who expressed his belief that the apostolic doctrine and practice of an all-male priesthood was “heresy,” and the March 12 “ordinations” have. What these last two events have betrayed is a dramatic development in Anglicanism away from Catholic theology, broadly understood. The Anglo-Catholics, who trace their theological heritage through the Tractarians of the 19th century to the Non-Jurors and Caroline divines of the 17th century, have been the promoters of Catholic faith and practice within the Church of England. But these new developments have shattered the illusion, cherished by most of them, that the Church of England is in some sense a branch of the Catholic Church.
Enjoyed reading this?
READ MORE! GET A FREE 7 DAY TRIALSUBSCRIBE TODAY
You May Also Enjoy
What might the Archbishop of Canterbury's "two-track" model for the Anglican Communion look like at the local level?
Review of The Achievement of John Henry Newman
Since all that was valid about the “Reformation protest” has been accepted by the Church, it is time for Protestants to “come home.”