By Avery Cardinal Dulles, S.J
Publisher: Our Sunday Visitor Books
Review Author: Michael Berg
The back cover of this book carries the following description: “In this confident, unified, and unflinching assessment of the key elements of the Catholic Faith, Father Avery Dulles, S.J., illuminates the darkness of skepticism and unbelief that plague modern life, truly presenting apologetics without apology.” While this is fine as far as it goes, this description neglects possibly the most remarkable feature of the book: a surprisingly youthful joyousness, befitting one of the more famous modern-day converts.
To be sure, Cardinal Dulles presents a marvelous short course on the Faith with such clarity and purpose that this book would be very useful for would-be converts, as well as for other catechetical purposes. But there is more going on here: Even seasoned Catholics will thoroughly enjoy this book and experience something of a call to action, because the Cardinal conveys to the reader a certain irrepressible joy, a passion and lively love for the Faith. The book has a pervasive esprit that will lift the hearts of members of the flock who might find their burdens heavy or who might be growing jaded.
The vision of the book is unquestioningly consonant with the vision of the Holy Father: It is directed to a new evangelization. With the West in clear decline, de facto pagan or worse, with the Culture of Death all around us, we are called to re-evangelize what were once the bastions of the Faith. The missionary call is to bear witness to Jesus Christ and His Church in our neighborhoods, in our places of employ, and often even in our parish halls. For such purposes Cardinal Dulles’s book is a vade mecum of what the Church teaches, and then some.
In 12 short and well-written chapters, Cardinal Dulles offers us a work of apologetics in the traditional meaning of the word but in a contemporary style. We emerge intellectually prepared to defend our Faith against all opponents, from street-corner cynics to jaundiced academics. Starting with an analysis of “the present situation of faith,” Dulles proceeds to the proofs of God’s existence, the Person of Christ, the particular charisms deposited in the Church, and her responsibilities — and he differentiates proper teaching from heresy.
Dulles goes on to delineate three stages of evangelization, all in keeping with John Paul II’s personalism. Indeed, it is proper to regard Dulles’s writings as intimately tied to the unique pontificate of John Paul II, whose characteristic orthodoxy, joy, empathy, and regard for tradition (mixed with a modern consciousness) resonate beautifully with what we discern about Cardinal Dulles from the pages of this book.
By Charles E. Curran
Publisher: Georgetown University Press
Review Author: Thomas Storck
Fr. Charles Curran is a well-known dissenter from Catholic moral teaching who teaches at Southern Methodist University. In this volume Curran undertakes an ambitious review of Catholic social teaching since Leo XIII’s encyclical Rerum Novarum of 1891.
The subject of this book, the Church’s teaching on the right ordering of the socio-economic order, is of immense importance. Many Catholics are entirely ignorant of this aspect of magisterial teaching; others reject it outright. Many who are otherwise orthodox take great pains to reinterpret social doctrine to fit their personal notions about economics, notions derived not from Catholic tradition but ultimately from 18th-century Deism, notions which in America fall under the general heading “conservatism” (though in other parts of the world they are called by their right name, “liberalism”).
As one might expect, Curran is not an entirely reliable guide. Although this work contains considerable information about the Church’s social doctrine, it is mixed with so much erroneous interpretation, and presents so many hypotheses as facts, that it is not a safe guide for those not already familiar with Catholic social teaching and theology.
Curran’s account of events in the life of the Church, especially since the Second Vatican Council, reflects the modernist interpretation of Church history. For example, he contrasts the approach of the social encyclicals of Leo XIII and Pius XI, in which, by the authority of the Roman See, the Popes gave an authoritative interpretation of the natural law and the Gospel, with the approach that he claims has increasingly come to the fore since the 1960s, in which the Church is willing to “learn from the world.” As he says, “The hierarchical teaching office has changed from the authoritative source of eternal and natural law applied to human problems to a dialogue partner that has something to contribute to the world but also can learn from the world.” It is true that the tone of papal pronouncements on the social order has changed from Leo XIII to John Paul II. Much of the style of papal social statements and actions does reflect the times — one can discern this by comparing statements from the Middle Ages with those of Pius XII. Though the changes since Vatican II have been more abrupt than usual, one who looks carefully at magisterial documents since the Council can see an essential continuity. Curran, it seems, does not look at this essential continuity, but only at changed forms, and thus concludes that we are in a new situation. He is far from alone in making that judgment, for it seems to be the received wisdom that the Church has altered her teaching in many ways in the past thirty-five years. But Curran’s view, doubtless on purpose, plays into the hands of the modernist project, which necessarily assumes this great change in order to pursue its own agenda.
Although this book raises some valuable points and contains some interesting reflections, I cannot recommend it. A more elementary yet more authoritative approach is Fr. Rodger Charles’s An Introduction to Catholic Social Teaching (Ignatius), reviewed in the February 2001 NOR.
By Mark A. Noll
Review Author: David Denton
Three hundred and sixty-seven years ago, the Rev. Richard Denton, priest of His Majesty Charles I’s Church of England, having found the Church’s Book for Sports on the Sabbath-Day “insupportable,” set sail with his wife Helen and their five children aboard the ship James and arrived in Boston in 1635. He would be known as a dissenting clergyman “of the Presbyterian variety,” and served as pastor of several churches in Connecticut and on Long Island. He is also my “great, great…grandfather.” As I read Noll’s The Old Religion in a New World, I could not help but reflect on the Presbyterian Church, its vicissitudes often figuring in Noll’s historical accounts. What would “Grandfather” Richard make of the Presbyterian denomination in the late 20th century, approving “the right of a woman to choose an abortion”? What would he, a Cambridge man, make of the first Presbyterian seminary in America, later known as Princeton University, seating in the late 20th century an atheistic Jewish “ethicist” who supports infanticide in an endowed chair of ethics? Mostly I wonder what the Rev. Denton would make of me, 11 generations later, choosing to become a Catholic. I am not alone as an “old” American, despondently viewing 21st-century Christianity — many “new” Americans feel the same. The Presbyterians and Princeton are certainly not unique in displaying appalling, catastrophic apostasies. I single the Presbyterians out only as notorious examples of the endemic, pervasive religious decline, starkly apparent in the pages of Noll’s history. It goes without saying what “Grandfather” Richard’s responses would be to my first two questions. Noll’s history has helped to solidify my growing conviction on the third.
Noll has produced a very engaging and rewarding introduction to the history of the North American Christian churches, their theological developments, and their roles in the surrounding culture. For example, his account of the lonely, gallant, but doomed struggle of the classically erudite Presbyterian theologian J. Gresham Machen in combating the liberalization of Princeton Theological Seminary and the Presbyterian denomination early in the 20th century is most poignant.
Noll demonstrates that from the earliest colonial periods, Christianity in North America has continually been forced through the fenestrations of fierce individualism and materialism, and democratic liberalism. Noll argues that in North America, even theological conservatism has been subject to this democratic liberalization, that the process is virtually inescapable. He sees North American conservatism as merely lagging 20 years behind an ever-accelerating liberalism. In my view, this North American “Christianity” now vies with Catholicism and Islam to be the most powerful religious force in the world.
For this reviewer, then, American liberalism is now becoming culturally dominant in the world. But what if this “progress” of North American liberal Christianity, so fairly covered in Noll’s book, has now “advanced” beyond the natural carrying capacity of the human heart and mind? What if the stored moral capital of two millennia of orthodox Christianity has itself now been consumed in North America? What if the Mayflower Compact, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and Bill of Rights are now just so much ideological posturing without a sacramental Christianity to infuse and sanctify them and an apostolic hierarchy to interpret them? What happens when pride, licentiousness, and greed are allowed to run rampant?
Catholicism alone will stand against that which religious error has released into the world. So I think “Granddad” Richard would approve.
Enjoyed reading this?
READ MORE! REGISTER TODAYSUBSCRIBE
"Catholicism's Intellectual Prizefighter!"
- Karl Keating
Strengthen the Catholic cause.
SUPPORT NOR TODAYSUBSCRIBE
You May Also Enjoy
The Human Zoo... Deperate Housewives Syndrome... "Borrow a Person"... Five-Strike Policy... Novus Harem... Rent-a-Guest... Southern Comfort... From Convicts to Collagen...
During a recent trip to Rome, I enjoyed an evening in the company of a…
What happens when the Archbishop of San Francisco comes face-to-face with costumed blasphemers? He gives them Communion.