America’s Linguistic Revolution
NOTES FROM THE WORD CEMETERY
Words are fascinating. Like people, they are born on a certain day and, at a certain point in time, they pass away. Whenever I come across something verbally archaic, I jot it down in a little brown notebook that I call my “word cemetery.” At the end of my notebook is a section devoted to vocabulary that is new. If anyone asks me why I’m so interested in verbal comings and goings, I point to my gray hair and tell them that I grew up during the 1950s.
None of us had “issues” back in those days. “Arguments” and “disagreements,” perhaps, but never issues. We “hung our clothes out to dry,” we “saved for a rainy day,” and when we went shopping we took care not to be “snookered” or “hoodwinked.” To address a group of girls as “you guys” would have been unthinkable. “Xerox” was not yet on the radar screen, but we were familiar with “carbon copies.” A fellow whom we liked was “a good egg,” and if an hombre repeated himself too often he sounded “like a broken record.” Few members of today’s younger generation have ever heard a phonograph record, let alone one that is broken.
You might suspect, by now, that I am something of an antiquarian. If so, you are right. Call me an “old fogey,” if you like. There is one thing, however, that I wish to make clear. In dealing with shifts in word usage and custom, my concern is more for the present than the past because I fear for the future of our country. Seared in my memory are the words of George Washington’s Farewell Address: “Morality is a necessary spring of popular government,” and “only with caution can we indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion.”
The question is where we stand in relation to Washington’s claim that godlessness leads to immorality, and immorality to a breakdown in democratic governance. It is no secret that American political parties have moved further and further apart ideologically, fueling suspicion and animosity. Not since the Civil War has there been such hatred for one side by the other. Why? Clearly, there has been a marked increase in atheism and churchlessness. Yet I have heard people say that we are no less virtuous today than we were 70 years ago, that evil is evil, regardless of time and place. I am of a different opinion, and I stake my case on a comparative study of custom and word usage, one that is based on personal, firsthand observation.
Enjoyed reading this?
READ MORE! GET A FREE 7 DAY TRIALSUBSCRIBE TODAY
You May Also Enjoy
Neuhaus’s plea for the restoration of religious values in the public sphere and for the believing community to act there on the basis of its beliefs is proper and necessary.
Can dictionaries engender controversy? They certainly can in England — from Dr. Johnson’s definition of…
How can experts sort solidly idealistic activists from those who would end up a source of trouble to themselves or to those meant to be helped?