From the Narthex
Farewell to the Pocket Paperback
By John M. Grondelski
We are constantly flooded with stimuli — so much so that we often fail to notice when seemingly unrelated developments share a common logic. Consider two recent pieces in The New York Times. In one, Oren Cass criticizes what he calls “financialization”: an economy increasingly devoted not to producing goods but to extracting value through layers of financial manipulation. In another, Elizabeth Harris laments the quiet disappearance of the mass-market paperback book.
At first glance, these topics appear to inhabit different realms. Yet they are symptoms of the same underlying shift: When institutions prioritize margin over mission, accessibility tends to suffer.
Let’s consider the second development, though the first helps illuminate it. The decline of the pocket paperback is not merely a publishing curiosity. It raises a larger question: What kind of reading culture are we prepared to sustain?
Those of us old enough can remember when “reading” meant taking a thing made of paper into our hands, opening it, and turning the pages of what was called a “book.” Those who recall that artifact probably also remember the cheap paperbacks available for $1.99 or so on drugstore racks and elsewhere. (In my boyhood, many were less than a buck.)
You May Also Enjoy
One youth says, “I look at those teachers and their books, and I say: man, you’re out in space, and I’m where I am, and there’s nothing between us.”
The Western world is now holding its grand fin de millénium party, an exuberant celebration…
Infant mortality, life expectancy, and disability rates confirm that the poor and uninsured permanently suffer the consequences of our broken healthcare system.