Volume > Issue > Note List > Would Protecting the Lives of The Unborn Be Tyranny?

Would Protecting the Lives of The Unborn Be Tyranny?

John Courtney Murray, S.J., is reputed to be the brains behind Vatican II’s Declaration on Religious Liberty (Dignitatis Humanae), which essentially disavowed the Confessional State and endorsed the separation of Church and State. This is usually considered the most radical document of Vatican II, and theologians have debated whether it is a repudiation of previous Church teaching or a development of it, or something else.

Cruelly, just as the Church was endorsing freedom of conscience in society, along came the sexual (and drug) revolution — pre-marital sex, extramarital sex, pornography, filthy and blasphemous speech, feminism, abortion, and homosexuality.

Fr. Murray was intent on teaching Catholics how to function in a pluralistic democratic society. Writing in America (Aug. 2-9, 2004), Fr. Gregory Kalscheur, S.J., an Assistant Professor at the Boston College Law School, draws on Murray to argue that Catholic politicians can be “personally opposed to abortion” while conscientiously adopting a position that does not favor restricting or outlawing legal abortion.

Kalscheur takes note of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith’s Doctrinal Note on Some Questions Regarding the Participation of Catholics in Political Life (Nov. 2002), quoting it as saying that “Those who are directly involved in lawmaking bodies have a ‘grave and clear obligation to oppose’ any law that attacks human life.”

Kalscheur responds: “How a public official ought to go about doing that, however, is a more complicated question, especially given the state of American constitutional law regarding the abortion issue…. In the United States abortion is a matter of constitutional right, not an action authorized by legislation. To a large extent, the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Constitution…means that there is no need for legislation authorizing procured abortion; and any legislative efforts to reduce the incidence of abortion through statutory prohibition will face significant constitutional hurdles.” (Of course Kalscheur doesn’t mention that the Constitution can be amended and that since the Bill of Rights there have been 16 Amendments to the Constitution, including the abolition of slavery.)

Enjoyed reading this?



You May Also Enjoy

Last Things

It’s long been a dream for some, creating human beings without a womb. J.B.S. Haldane,…

Briefly: September 1993

Reviews of Time and Eternity... Moral Absolutes: Tradition, Revision and Truth... The Mystery We Proclaim: Catechesis at the Third Millennium... All God's Mistakes: Genetic Counseling in a Pediatric Hospital...

The Survival of the Fittest at Home & Abroad

If we do not want our war against Iraq to be repeated around the globe…