Unintelligible Profundities & Intelligible Muddles
WHY DO 'THE BEST & THE BRIGHTEST' FALL FOR THEM?
One of our most respected moralists, Alasdair MacIntyre, has lamented that there is “no rational way of securing moral agreement in our culture.” Why this moral breakdown?
One place to look for the answer is in the books of the more fashionable philosophers of the 20th century, men whose names are dropped with pride and whose sayings are quoted with respect in our institutions of higher learning, including some institutions of the Catholic persuasion.
Granted, the modern philosopher’s lot is not a happy one. Alfred North Whitehead once said that Western philosophy is all footnotes to Plato. An exaggeration, but true to this extent: Many of the interesting things were written long ago. In recent times there has been less and less room for originality.
Faced with this dilemma, many philosophers, starting about the time of Hegel in the early 19th century, have resorted to what A.O. Lovejoy calls “unintelligible profundity.” I have been working on a book that involves the intellectual history of the idea of justice, which has compelled me to read some of today’s fashionable philosophers, writers such as the German Martin Heidegger, the Frenchmen Jean-Paul Sartre and Jacques Derrida, and the Lithuanian-Frenchman Emmanuel Levinas.
You May Also Enjoy
Since Christ’s Sacrifice is present both on Calvary and at every single Mass, it is the same Sacrifice, and what is said of one must be said of the other.
The Humiliation of the Word... The Church and the Parachurch: An Uneasy Marriage... John Paul II and the Battle for Vatican II: Report from the Synod... Innocent Ecstasy: How Christianity Gave America an Ethic of Sexual Pleasure... Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart... Too Many People?: A Problem in Values
As soon as ethics chooses to sever its contact with religion -- as is fashionable in our decadent society -- it becomes a caricature of any true ethics.