Volume > Issue > The Virgin Birth: A Problem?

The Virgin Birth: A Problem?

LETTER FROM ENGLAND

By John Warwick Montgomery | December 1993
The Rev. John Warwick Montgomery, a Lutheran, is a practicing barrister and Professor of Law and Hu­manities at the University of Luton in England.

England is the preeminent country for the cel­ebration of Christmas. Blessed with Dickens and no separation of church and state (and therefore no kill­joy ACLU or anti-Christian political correctness), London’s Trafalgar Square sports not only a magnifi­cent Christmas tree each December, but also a life-size Nativity scene — at public expense, to be sure. So Christmasy are the English that, by August, hotels throughout the country have printed Christmas bro­chures to entice the populace to celebrate Noël before their respective hearths.

A Sheffield University astronomer, one David Hughes, has, however, just dropped a bombshell (or, rather, shot up a star shell). He argues that an un­usual conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn on Septem­ber 15, 7 B.C., marks the true date of our Lord’s birth, so Christmas ought properly to be celebrated three months earlier. So much for Christina Rossetti’s “In the Bleak Mid-Winter”!

To which at least three responses are possible: (1) What’s the big deal? The merchants have almost reached the point of commencing their Christmas promotions that early anyway. (2) Hughes has his stars confused: Surely a planetary conjunction is not going to guide Magi to a particular stable/cave and then stand over it. (3) To quote the London Times‘s third leader on the subject: “The birthday of Jesus is a date for mystery, not precision.”

But if the date isn’t important, why is the man­ner of that birth? Could we not equally claim, as do so many liberal theologians of both Catholic and Protes­tant persuasion today, that the precise manner of Jesus’ birth is as unimportant as its date?

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

“Diabolic Disorientation” in the Church

Every warning consisting of lethal consequences issued by Mary at Fatima continues to fall into place precisely as foretold.

The Gospels of Peter & Mary

Peter was almost certainly looking over the shoulder of Mark during the writing of the second Gospel, and Jesus’ own mother had enormous influence on Luke.

The Annunciation: Mary’s Magnificent Act of Consent

Mary’s response to the angel’s message issued from the depths of her soul, bound her for all her days, and made salvation possible for mankind.