Volume > Issue > The Virgin Birth: A Problem?

The Virgin Birth: A Problem?

LETTER FROM ENGLAND

By John Warwick Montgomery | December 1993
The Rev. John Warwick Montgomery, a Lutheran, is a practicing barrister and Professor of Law and Hu­manities at the University of Luton in England.

England is the preeminent country for the cel­ebration of Christmas. Blessed with Dickens and no separation of church and state (and therefore no kill­joy ACLU or anti-Christian political correctness), London’s Trafalgar Square sports not only a magnifi­cent Christmas tree each December, but also a life-size Nativity scene — at public expense, to be sure. So Christmasy are the English that, by August, hotels throughout the country have printed Christmas bro­chures to entice the populace to celebrate Noël before their respective hearths.

A Sheffield University astronomer, one David Hughes, has, however, just dropped a bombshell (or, rather, shot up a star shell). He argues that an un­usual conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn on Septem­ber 15, 7 B.C., marks the true date of our Lord’s birth, so Christmas ought properly to be celebrated three months earlier. So much for Christina Rossetti’s “In the Bleak Mid-Winter”!

To which at least three responses are possible: (1) What’s the big deal? The merchants have almost reached the point of commencing their Christmas promotions that early anyway. (2) Hughes has his stars confused: Surely a planetary conjunction is not going to guide Magi to a particular stable/cave and then stand over it. (3) To quote the London Times‘s third leader on the subject: “The birthday of Jesus is a date for mystery, not precision.”

But if the date isn’t important, why is the man­ner of that birth? Could we not equally claim, as do so many liberal theologians of both Catholic and Protes­tant persuasion today, that the precise manner of Jesus’ birth is as unimportant as its date?

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

Henry Adams, the Doctrine of Progress & the Virgin

Adams would have affirmed Leon Bloy's observation that the holier a woman is the more womanly she is.

The Religion of Dr. Johnson

Biographer Peter Quennell leaves no room for ambiguity: "Johnson…admitted no compromise, but asserted the unshakable truth of every major point of Christian doctrine."

The Virgin Birth: A Problem?

Couldn't God have become man otherwise? Sure, but this is how He did it, and it stands as a test of whether we are willing to accept His methods over our speculations.