The Vatican Looks at Non-Marxist Socialism
WITH THE WISDOM OF THE AGES
In this age, dubbed by many “the Second Enlightenment,” people are no more willing than they ever were to hear unpleasant facts. When some time ago I wrote an article in another magazine on “Socialism Sí, Küng No” (the silly title was affixed by the editors), indignant letters and phone calls put me down as a bad Catholic, in effect, for not closing my eyes to the evidence. My point in that article was that, faced with the internal upheaval of quasi-heresy (the elucubrations of Küng, Rahner, Schillebeeckx, Jossua, et al.) and the sociopolitical influence of socialism, the Church would combat the first, and seek accommodations with the second.
I added that this is what always happened over the last 2,000 years: when a new political or social configuration emerged — the feudal system, Renaissance humanism, bourgeois power, royal absolutism, industrialization, science, republicanism, democracy, and now labor power or socialism — Rome waited until the new system or ideology eliminated its own sharp edges, then sought accommodation with the domesticated form. It entailed not doctrinal change on the Church’s part, but political acceptance, and also the acceptance of a certain new style. By the time coexistence became possible, accommodation did not imply concessions; for the Church the relationship became rather a matter of emphasis.
Today we are in a situation similar to past ages, something that the narrow mind cannot tolerate. Notwithstanding Reagan, Thatcher, or the (questionable) superiority of Giscardian policies over those of Mitterrand, socialism is gaining ground, not just in the domain of economics, but also and more importantly in that of intellectual discourse and style, social choices, and vision of the world. Masses of people in the capitalist world find in capitalism material satisfactions, but also find the human price paid for them too high. Masses of people in the communist world find Marxism detestable and counterproductive, but if they were free to choose, would opt for a non-Marxist socialism, with more freedom of choice, with a more “human face.”
These are facts. I did not invent them. Granted that in highly developed countries, capitalism “delivers the goods,” yet spokesmen for capitalism show their narrowmindedness when they assume that, say, India, Tanzania, Bolivia, or New Guinea may similarly and to their advantage be converted to the “correct creed” — i.e., capitalist orthodoxy. Largely missing in these and other places are all the preconditions of capitalism: Greek rationality, modern science, technical inclination, organizing spirit, fair play vis-à-vis opponents, the sense of the law which moderates greed, and so on.
Enjoyed reading this?
READ MORE! REGISTER TODAYSUBSCRIBE
You May Also Enjoy
The road from the Hiss-Chambers case to an American president’s advocacy of the idea of the Evil Empire was straight, though slow.
European Catholics grew aware of the need for an effective response to the conditions created by capitalism and industrialism during the 19th century.
Can the destructive side of the capitalist growth process be mitigated while doing minimal damage to the creative side?