Volume > Issue > The Tale of a Dead Seminary

The Tale of a Dead Seminary

HITCHHIKING WITH THE ZEITGEIST

By Stanley R. Rudcki | May 1995
The Rev. Stanley R. Rudcki is Associate Pastor of St. Alexander Catholic Church in Palos Heights, Illinois.

We began our seminary in 1961 as a two-year college with an enrollment of nearly 400 students, became a four-year college in 1968 affiliated with a Catholic university, and closed our campus in 1994 with a student body of 76, who were moved to the affiliated university campus, where the seminary will continue, but only as an extension of an existing mistake.

The faculty in those early years comprised good Catholic men, some prominent in the public eye; certainly none was a fool. Most of us believed ourselves flooded with the full daylight of modern enlightenment and freedom. Our faculty meetings were intellectually stimulating. More capable disputants would be hard to find. We met, talked, and disagreed, sometimes sharply. But the point on which we disagreed was not a hundredth part as extraordinary as the part on which we agreed, namely, change was necessary.

It must be explained that no one in authority told us how to start a college seminary. We started without precedents; we set our own precedents. True, we modeled the college after our Major Seminary, with its strict schedule. But during that first year it dawned on us that there didn’t exist any given norm for a seminary college to adhere to. If this were true, why couldn’t we begin to change things, gradually of course? When we began to relax the schedule, we were cautious enough to agree that we would review the success or failure of these changes after two years; to my knowledge we never did so. There was something challenging about groping in the dark, but we were really in the dark not only about the will of God or the will of the bishop, but about our own will. We were ready to move ahead, except we really did not know where to go next. We fancied ourselves a vanguard, advancing every time we eliminated a rule as outdated. By 1968 there were few rules left to eliminate. Thereafter, we referred to past rules as ‘expectations,” which the students immediately interpreted as unrealized ideals.

In the beginning we threw ourselves with all possible eagerness into the task of creating an ideal college seminary, and there was a moment when our hopes for communicating a Christian humanism and a Liberal Arts tradition had the road straight before it.

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

Dad, How Do You Say 'Video' in Latin?

Method more than content was the real drawback in the teaching of Latin and Greek before they were "squeezed out of the curriculum."

Protecting Our Children from Catholic Schools

Parents expect a faithful presentation of the Catholic faith, but they actually get dissent and the unexamined clichés of the social "gospel" and pop "spirituality."

The New Hate Speech: Catholic Teaching at a Catholic College

An affirmation of Church teaching at Providence College is seen by students and administrators as an act of "homophobia" and "transphobia" that warrants intimidation and threats because it's an offense against the PC narrative.