The Problem of the Pastor’s Dog
GUEST COLUMN
An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.
Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal “yes and no.”
Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.
Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest’s in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion — e.g., “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly” (Prov. 26:11) and “Do not give dogs what is holy” (Mt. 7:16).
You May Also Enjoy
The Five-Step Method... No Revocation of Ordination... Mel Gibson Is Not "Anti-Semitic"... Abortion, Nativism & Anti-Catholicism... The Vaccine Question... 'Gay' Stereotypes... Slippery Hegalian Fashion... "Ka-Ching": A New Song Unto the Lord... There Are Absolutes in Catholicism...
In a fit of inspiration, Dr. Pearson had added 15-minute appointments to the end of each day’s schedule. They were reserved for clients who needed an extra session...
Historicism and normative flexibility are incompatible with Scripture and Tradition, which includes the witness of countless martyrs to eternal moral truths.