The Problem of the Pastor’s Dog
GUEST COLUMN
An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.
Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal “yes and no.”
Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.
Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest’s in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion — e.g., “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly” (Prov. 26:11) and “Do not give dogs what is holy” (Mt. 7:16).
You May Also Enjoy
Review of Catholic Manual of Civility... Darwin's Plantation: Evolution's Racist Roots... Understanding Our Being: An Introduction to Speculative Philosophy in the Perennial Tradition...
Sympathy for Bloodsuckers... Royal Deity... Visions of Conchiglia... Dopey Idea... Music for Morons?... Monkey Business... Here, There & Everywhere... more
Engaging the great ideas as part of a broader discussion of topics relating to the faith is a vital resource in the evangelization of our culture.