The Problem of the Pastor’s Dog
GUEST COLUMN
An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.
Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal “yes and no.”
Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.
Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest’s in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion — e.g., “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly” (Prov. 26:11) and “Do not give dogs what is holy” (Mt. 7:16).
You May Also Enjoy
Here we review Veiled Leadership: Katharine Drexel, the Sisters of the Blessed Sacrament, and Race Relations by Amanda Bresie.
Freedom in its fullest sense isn't the absence of constraints. Rather, it is orientation toward the good and embedment in a community of mutually dependent selves.
Reviews of The Concentration Can... Latinos: A Biography of the People... Ignatius of Loyola: The Psychology of a Saint... Works of Mercy...