The Problem of the Pastor’s Dog
GUEST COLUMN
An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.
Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal “yes and no.”
Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.
Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest’s in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion — e.g., “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly” (Prov. 26:11) and “Do not give dogs what is holy” (Mt. 7:16).
You May Also Enjoy
Taking Issue with the South... Into the Dark Tunnel... Remarkable Parallels... A Genuinely Catholic Way of Thinking... The Remarriage of Objectivity & Subjectivity... Reflections on the Rise & Fall of Thomism
It's amazing when Communist officials have greater wisdom about disordered behavior than does the Archbishop of San Francisco.
Liberalism is pop culture, and pop culture is liberalism. It flows out in a torrent from the amps of the tattooed crooners of our woe-befallen land.