The Problem of the Pastor’s Dog
GUEST COLUMN
An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.
Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal “yes and no.”
Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.
Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest’s in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion — e.g., “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly” (Prov. 26:11) and “Do not give dogs what is holy” (Mt. 7:16).
You May Also Enjoy
Newman Celebration... Lighten Up!... As the World Turns... Cheap Laughs... Cream-Puff Religiosity?... You Catholics Have the Best Writers... Reformation or Deformation?... Reactionary... Not Error, but Sin... Fewer Rules, Fewer Priests... Intellectual Homework Must Be Done First...
Host to the Post... Feeling Profoundly Secular... Obama Said It, I Believe It... He's Always Been a Girl... Church as Bio-Hazard... Twenty-First Century Christ... The Talented Mr. Horran... No Big Shoes to Fill
Pathologies of Power: Health, Human Rights, and the New War on the Poor... The Design Revolution...