The Problem of the Pastor’s Dog
GUEST COLUMN
An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.
Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal “yes and no.”
Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.
Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest’s in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion — e.g., “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly” (Prov. 26:11) and “Do not give dogs what is holy” (Mt. 7:16).
You May Also Enjoy
I would like to speak in defense of fundamentalism despite the fact that there is…
He spoke with evident alarm about the decline in the persuasiveness of various religious and cultural norms, with serious consequences for family life.
Lumps, Bumps and Meditation... Playing Parents of "Gays" for Suckers... Is St. Monica Now Obsolete?... In the Name of the Father-Mother, Ron Rolheiser and the Holy Spirit... A Schism at Communio?... Psychiatric Stations of the Cross... Compassion and Psychobabble: What a Perfect Same-Sex Marriage!... Priest-Psychologist Hangs Himself