The Problem of the Pastor’s Dog
GUEST COLUMN
An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.
Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal “yes and no.”
Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.
Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest’s in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion — e.g., “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly” (Prov. 26:11) and “Do not give dogs what is holy” (Mt. 7:16).
You May Also Enjoy
Decades ago, the Dutch bishops -- and presumably their priests -- assumed leadership. It appears today that their American counterparts, at least in some places, have abdicated.
Reviews of The Failure of Modernism: The Cartesian Legacy and Contemporary Pluralism... Thomas Aquinas: Selected Writings... At the Threshold of the Third Millennium
Cameli believes in dialogue and would like to build a bridge between diametrically opposed camps. It's been said, however, that nobody lives on a bridge.