The Problem of the Pastor’s Dog
GUEST COLUMN
An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.
Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal “yes and no.”
Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.
Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest’s in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion — e.g., “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly” (Prov. 26:11) and “Do not give dogs what is holy” (Mt. 7:16).
You May Also Enjoy
Reviews of Augustine Through the Ages: An Encyclopedia... Schall on Chesterton: Timely Essays on Timeless Paradoxes... Who Owns America? A New Declaration of Independence...
Legions of doctors, health agencies, judges, lawyers, and reporters colluded to keep his case from doing any real damage to the abortion establishment.
Reviews of Negrophobia: A Race Riot in Atlanta, 1906 by Mark Bauerlein... Pocket Dictionary of Apologetics and Philosophy of Religion by C. Stephen Evans... A Man of the Beatitudes: Pier Giorgio Frassati by Luciana Frassati