The Problem of the Pastor’s Dog
GUEST COLUMN
An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.
Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal “yes and no.”
Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.
Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest’s in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion — e.g., “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly” (Prov. 26:11) and “Do not give dogs what is holy” (Mt. 7:16).
You May Also Enjoy
The Devil's Fingerprints... City of Confusion - Part II... It Can't Happen Here, Can It?... In Turkey, the Church Officially Does Not Exist
A "Compassionate Conservative" Advises Pope Benedict XVI... Prolifers: Thanks for the Votes; We'll See You Again in Four Years... Benedict the Moderate?... A Case Study in the Theology of Apology... "Perhaps the Most Powerful Man in the Church in America"... more
"I die daily" is creedal. The more one waits on this phrase and lets it reverberate, the more one realizes that it focuses not just Paul the man but also a whole theology.