The Problem of the Pastor’s Dog
GUEST COLUMN
An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.
Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal “yes and no.”
Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.
Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest’s in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion — e.g., “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly” (Prov. 26:11) and “Do not give dogs what is holy” (Mt. 7:16).
You May Also Enjoy
Even the brightest graduates of diocesan Catholic schools are idiots.
Slouching Toward Civil War... A Non-Catholic Views Smorgasborg 'Catholics'... Oxford's Bad Grammar... Chesterton: No Curmudgeon... When Catholic Schools Aren't Catholic... ...
How to Eliminate the Poor... You Can Criticize Bad Bishops, But Don't You Dare Criticize the Pope Who Appointed Them... Wise Advice From a Vocations Director... What's Good for the Corporations Is Good for America... Wily Guys... A New Catholic Community... The Beat Goes On... In Vitro Clinics Are Death Camps... A Pox On Both Your Houses... "Relevant Public Authorities"?...