The Problem of the Pastor’s Dog
GUEST COLUMN
An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.
Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal “yes and no.”
Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.
Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest’s in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion — e.g., “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly” (Prov. 26:11) and “Do not give dogs what is holy” (Mt. 7:16).
You May Also Enjoy
Reviews of Death Foretold: The Jesuit Murders in El Salvador... Peace or Armageddon? The Unfolding of the Middle East Peace Accord... Making Men Moral: Civil Liberties and Public Morality... Black Dogs... Against the Heresies... The Concise Dictionary of Early Christianity... Pro-Life Activist's Encyclopedia...
Ed. Note: Our November 1998 editorial was in large measure devoted to the matter of…
In divorcing my first wife I had, I thought, acted dishonorably. To be granted an annulment — to repudiate the existence of our marriage — would compound it.