Volume > Issue > The Problem of the Pastor's Dog

The Problem of the Pastor’s Dog

GUEST COLUMN

By Joseph L. Lennon | May 2007
The Rev. Joseph L. Lennon, O.P. is a former Vice President of Providence College in Rhode Island.

An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.

Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal “yes and no.”

Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.

Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest’s in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion — e.g., “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly” (Prov. 26:11) and “Do not give dogs what is holy” (Mt. 7:16).

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

The Voice of Mother Angelica

What makes her so appealing to many? She is the voice of the little guy, people who have been held in contempt in their Church for at least 30 years.

New Oxford Notes: June 2011

Irony & the Obama Catholic... How I Learned to Stop Worrying & Love the Internet... Is Your Job on the Endangered-Species List?

Why Was Christ a Male & Why Did He Ordain Only Men?

The priest symbolizes the Bridegroom, but he is not the Bridegroom; rather he lends his male body and soul to Jesus to re-enact the symbolic nuptials.