The Problem of the Pastor’s Dog
GUEST COLUMN
An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.
Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal “yes and no.”
Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.
Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest’s in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion — e.g., “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly” (Prov. 26:11) and “Do not give dogs what is holy” (Mt. 7:16).
You May Also Enjoy
Conscience is an exercise of practical reason — that is, reasoning about what one is to do. It engages the whole person.
“I didn’t know Christians would help me,” the expectant mother told the counselor. “I thought they were all mean.”
Reviews of Natural Law and Contemporary Public Policy... Vital Remnants: America's Founding and the Western Tradition... Original Sin: Illuminating the Riddle... The Best of Mike Royko: One More Time... Religion, Politics, and Peace... Misión Guadalupe...