The Problem of the Pastor’s Dog
GUEST COLUMN
An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.
Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal “yes and no.”
Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.
Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest’s in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion — e.g., “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly” (Prov. 26:11) and “Do not give dogs what is holy” (Mt. 7:16).
You May Also Enjoy
An attempt to "construct" martyrs as rhetorical ploys does not work. Nothing is more real and solid than their immortal victory and unfading glory.
Nature’s Prophet: Alfred Russel Wallace and His Evolution From Natural Selection to Natural Theology... L’Islam Face au Christianisme
Return, Then, Most Gracious Advocate... Episcopal Church Barbie -- High Church Edition... Clueless at the Foreign Office... To Catch a Pope... Pornographic Crucifix?... Psychic Terrorism... Mayor Mort... Brewery Workers of the World, Unite! -- For Free Beer... Sheepish Convicts... Margin of Error...