Volume > Issue > The Problem of the Pastor's Dog

The Problem of the Pastor’s Dog

GUEST COLUMN

By Joseph L. Lennon | May 2007
The Rev. Joseph L. Lennon, O.P. is a former Vice President of Providence College in Rhode Island.

An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.

Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal “yes and no.”

Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.

Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest’s in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion — e.g., “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly” (Prov. 26:11) and “Do not give dogs what is holy” (Mt. 7:16).

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

The Tyranny of Inexorable Technological Change

NOR is an austere, low-budget undertaking, and keeping our costs and salaries to a minimum has been cru­cial to our survival.

The Vision & Future of the NEW OXFORD REVIEW

We believe Christianity is about truth. We take theology seriously because theology enables us to say something intelligible about truth and what it requires of us.

Letter to the Editor: April 1995

Missing the Point... Putting Children First... Blown Away By Coles... Slippery Slope... Let Me Try Again... Vanauken: Comic-Book Writer... St. Vladimir: Catholic... Desiring to Be Deceived...