The Problem of the Pastor’s Dog
GUEST COLUMN
An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.
Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal “yes and no.”
Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.
Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest’s in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion — e.g., “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly” (Prov. 26:11) and “Do not give dogs what is holy” (Mt. 7:16).
You May Also Enjoy
Though scholars may dispute some of his interpretations of St. Thomas, Maritain remains our most accessible neo-Thomist guide to contemporary culture.
Have you heard the news? There's a new revolution in the Church! It's been started by, of all people, a little old lady from County Cork.
The Indoctrination of the American Masses... The Apotheosis of Entertainment... A Model of Modern-Day Martyrdom... Who Is Responsible for Our Failures in Iraq?... Those Catholic "Privileges"... A Magazine Writer Cannot Revoke a Magisterial Ruling... The Popes on Capitalism... Why Faulty?... and more