Volume > Issue > The Problem of the Pastor's Dog

The Problem of the Pastor’s Dog

GUEST COLUMN

By Joseph L. Lennon | May 2007
The Rev. Joseph L. Lennon, O.P. is a former Vice President of Providence College in Rhode Island.

An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.

Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal “yes and no.”

Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.

Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest’s in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion — e.g., “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly” (Prov. 26:11) and “Do not give dogs what is holy” (Mt. 7:16).

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

The Astronomical Cost of Priestesses In the Church of England

Any full-time Church of England clergyman who worked for at least five years prior to 1992 was entitled to compensation if he resigned over women's ordination.

The Conservative Surrender in the Culture Wars

In 1992 conservative commentator Irving Kristol observed that “[the culture wars] are over, and the…

On the Authoritativeness of Scripture

Author’s Note: The following was recently presented as an informal lecture to the Theology Forum…