Volume > Issue > The Ancient Game of Guilt Abatement

The Ancient Game of Guilt Abatement

CRUSHING COMFORTING CANARDS

By Frederick W. Marks | September 2020
Frederick W. Marks, a Contributing Editor of the NOR, is the author of ten books, including, most recently, Confessions of a Catholic Street Evangelist and Pro-Life Champion: The Untold Story of Monsignor Philip J. Reilly and His Helpers of God’s Precious Infants.

In recent years Catholic churchgoers, along with the priests who minister to them, have bought into “feel-good” notions that act like a sedative on the conscience. I will examine a fair number of them. But before doing so, a word or two about the historical context. Guilt-suppression is as old as man. It began with the blame game played by Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, and it has been replayed many times over in classical literature. Among dramatic figures, few are more villainous than Hedda Gabler in Henrik Ibsen’s eponymous play, who is scripted to say, “Something comes over me. I just have to give way to meanness.” In Verdi’s opera Rigoletto, a malevolent hunchback blames “nature” and a debauched court, rather than his own folly, for the misfortune that befalls him. In the movie African Queen, Charlie Allnut, a tough ship mechanic (played by Humphrey Bogart), gets drunk and terrorizes a lady named Rose (Katherine Hepburn). When he comes to, he blames his overindulgence on human nature. To which Rose replies, “Nature, Mr. Allnut, is what we are put in this world to rise above.”

Religious leaders have come up with their own formulas to lessen the pain of guilt, all of them at odds with Scripture. Martin Luther’s contention that salvation is gained by faith alone conflicts with the teaching of Jesus (cf. Mt. 19:17), along with that of St. Peter, St. James, St. John, and St. Paul. John Calvin’s theory of predestination clashes with the biblical assurance that God “wishes all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth” (1 Tim. 2:4). The evangelical dogma “once saved, always saved” is belied by Paul: “Let him who thinks he stands take heed lest he fall” (1 Cor. 10:12).

More recently, folks have shifted the blame for sin onto the shoulders of society or DNA, and this, too, runs afoul of Scripture: “Say not ‘it was God’s doing that I fell away’…. If you choose, you can keep the commandments” (Sir. 15:11, 15).

Catholic homilists cannot be faulted for playing the blame game, but the aim of the game many of them have been playing remains the same. They seek to please and placate. First on their list of comforting canards is the idea that we need not fear God, that He will love us no matter what we do. Such assurance would be unobjectionable were it not for its lack of balance. Yes, the Lord loves saints and sinners alike. Indisputable, too, is the fact that He is on our side in the battle against evil, ready to give us all the help we need to gain Heaven. But there is a caveat. God is demanding. He can be angry at times, and when His wrath rises, He will punish. In the imagery of American poet Julia Ward Howe, He tramples out “the vintage where the grapes of wrath are stored.”

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

The Catholic Church in South Korea

One of the greatest Korean novelists, Yi Kwang-su, a non-Catholic, once said that it was…

Letters to the Editor: September 2020

The Waiting Is the Hardest Part... Fr. Maciel’s “Lieutenants”... Worthy of the Original... The Coronavirus Conundrum... Sympathy for the Stones... and more

New Oxford Notes: April 2009

The Self-Destruction of a Cult of Personality... Return Volley... U.S. Seminaries: Conditiona Stabalized...