Some Questions for David Stolinsky
WHAT DOUBLE STANDARD?
Being an admirer of David Stolinsky’s work as it has previously appeared in the NEW OXFORD REVIEW, I am compelled to express my puzzlement with his article “‘Except Jews’: A Double Standard for Israel” (NOR, Oct. 2001). Several statements in the article provoke serious questions.
I was a specialist in Middle Eastern affairs for the U.S. Army some years ago, and while I’d certainly not call myself an expert, I believe I have enough knowledge to detect problems in certain of Stolinsky’s statements.
Statement 1 (by Stolinsky): “Many observers…seem to agree…that it is up to the Israelis to give up more of the West Bank than the 90-plus percent they have already yielded to the Palestinians, and in addition give up control of the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.”
Question: How did Israel obtain the West Bank in the first place? Why is it considered occupied territory and not a part of Israel?
You May Also Enjoy
Unless a speaker is actually advocating violence, we can't simply equate speaking with violence. Speech doesn't become violence simply because one disagrees with it.
From sacred Scripture and the rich Catholic school of prayer we know to pray to the Father in the name of the Son and in the power of the Holy Spirit.
Our population level is not necessarily bad in and of itself. Rather, it just amplifies the good or evil that is already in place.