Volume > Issue > Prolifers & the Reagan/Bush Tease

Prolifers & the Reagan/Bush Tease


By Dale Vree | March 1993
Dale Vree is Editor of New Oxford Review.

Prolifers had the time of their lives with Ronnie and George, but the party’s finally over. Morning in America came and went. Now it’s the morning after. Ronnie and George have waltzed out of town for good, and it’s hard for prolifers to decide what hurts more, the heartache or the hangover.

The much-touted love affair between prolife and Reagan/Bush has actually been a one-way street. Love is often blind, and so, for 12 intoxicating years, prolifers have by and large refused to believe they were being strung along. But maybe now that prolifers are left with little more than dirty ashtrays and empty bottles, they’ll get sober and wise up — and listen.

Consider the evidence. As Governor of California, Ronald Reagan signed one of the most permissive abortions laws in the country (at that time). When running for President in 1980, he said he had changed his mind on abortion (the Gipper as the original abortion flip-flopper), and promised in writing to pick a prolife running mate. But he first offered the job to pro-choice Gerald Ford (who declined). Then he offered it to pro-choice George Bush, who, when campaigning for the GOP presi­dential nomination in Florida in 1979, had told prolife leader Dr. Bart Hefferman, who had queried him about his views on abortion, “Go f— yourself!” Charles E. Rice had observed that were Reagan to select Bush, “Reagan would clearly signal to the prolife movement that the [abortion) issue is not that important to him and that he is therefore not to be trust­ed on it.” Reagan did pick Bush, but Rice, like the vast majority of single-issue prolifers, voted for Reagan anyway.

Linda Zumpano asked, “how many more promises does he have to break” before prolif­ers realize Reagan can’t be trusted on abortion? Zumpano, whose clearheadedness was a rarity among prolifers, was supporting Ellen McCor­mack for President on the Right-to-Life Party ticket.

Enjoyed reading this?



You May Also Enjoy

The News You May Have Missed

Meth Church... One-Man Pyramid Scheme... Ab Roller Not Included... Buying Time... Money to Burn... Home(less) Decor... The Perfect Job?... Britain's Got Talent!... Miserable Miami

Searching for the Real Ratzinger

He is a man of extraordinary intellectual and spiritual depth, and when he says that the thing we need is more holiness he does not sound hollow or platitudinous.

All Catholics Should Major in Double E

The Eucharist without the episcopacy is invalid. The episcopacy without the Eucharist is more or less useless. The two are mutually reinforcing.