No Catholic Church, No Scientific Method
The argument that the Church has a role to play in the continuing evolution of scientific endeavor is no doubt confusing to many people, believers and nonbelievers alike. In modern times it has become fashionable to think of the Catholic Church as somehow antithetical to science. The idea is virtually universal among nonbelievers, among whom I, alas, count myself. I suspect the idea has become more common among Catholics as well. There is no reason it should be: The scientific project, even the scientific method itself, is an invention of the Catholic Church.
What we refer to today as “science” is something invented by man. There is a definite date before which there was no science, and a date after which there was science. This isn’t controversial or mysterious: We know exactly when it happened. In fact, some of the original manuscripts that helped codify science and modern scientific thought still exist. For some reason, many today like to think of Galileo as the first scientist. Though he was indeed a great scientist, he was by no means the first; he was simply the first to have political difficulties as a result of his discoveries. Oddly, nobody gives Galileo credit for being a devout Catholic (see “The Galileo Legend” by Thomas Lessl, NOR, June 2000).
Science was invented in the high Middle Ages, a peculiar era of high prosperity and human achievement in Europe and other parts of the world. It was a time of knights, a time when Europeans reached their true potential as civilized people. The great European universities were founded during this happy era: Bologna, Coimbra, Paris, Oxford, Salamanca, Cambridge, Montpelier, Padua. The very idea of the university was invented during this period, and it came straight from Catholic monasticism. Musical notation was invented. Windmills, eyeglasses, printing, improved clocks — all were invented around this time, and other inventions, like paper, the spinning wheel, and the magnetic compass, were introduced from abroad by the great commercial city-states.
We have visual evidence of the glory and prosperity of this time in Europe in the form of the Gothic cathedrals. One can look at these magnificent churches as the physical crystallization of the same heroic spirit that produced the scientific method, in the same sense that one can look at the Parthenon of Pericles as the physical crystallization of the spirit of Plato and the Greek philosophers.
Enjoyed reading this?
READ MORE! REGISTER TODAYSUBSCRIBE
You May Also Enjoy
Our God Is a Very Large God... Bonzo for Bagel Head... Virtual Affection... Queering the Last Supper... Getting Paid to Destroy... Cheap Renoir, Part Deux... The King's Treasures... Crash-Test Daddy... Introducing the Bio-Cycle
Reviews of Catholicism and Liberalism... Julian of Norwich's Showings: From Vision to Book... In the Likeness of Sinful Flesh: An Essay on the Humanity of Christ... Virtue and the Promise of Conservatism: The Legacy of Burke and Tocqueville... Warning: Nonsense is Destroying America. The Role of Popular Culture in America's Social Problems... Christianity for Modern Pagans: Pascal's Pensées... Making Sense of It All: Pascal and the Meaning of Life... Raising up a Faithful Priest...
This April Popes John XXIII and John Paul II were canonized together. This moment of…