Volume > Issue > What Is to Be Done?

What Is to Be Done?

EDITORIAL

By Dale Vree | March 1997

Those of you who have read our November 1996 editorial know we’ve been wanting to magnify the NEW OXFORD REVIEW’s witness to Catholic orthodoxy at this crucial juncture in Church history by expanding the size of the NOR. We explained that we need to raise at least $57,000 — a bare-minimum figure — by January 31 to accomplish that goal, and we left the matter in your good hands.

Well, January 31 has come and gone. So, what is the verdict?

The verdict is: a big question mark. No verdict! We have not reached our goal, but we’re close, so close.

We could just say: “Sorry, folks, we didn’t reach the goal. We won’t increase the number of pages in the NOR, because it’s just too risky to do so with insufficient funding. That’s that. We’ll just put the moneys raised into paying bills and intensifying our search for new subscribers, exactly as we said we’d do in the event we didn’t reach our goal.”

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

Briefly: October 2005

Reviews of Memory and Identity: Conversations at the Dawn of a Millennium... Swimming With Scapulars: True Confessions of a Young Catholic... Fully Human, Fully Divine: An Interactive Christology... Drawn into the Mystery of Jesus Through the Gospel of John... Silent Music: The Life, Work, and Thought of St. John of the Cross

The Museum Piece Called "Anglo-Papalism”

Review of A Tactful God. Gregory Dix: Priest, Monk and Scholar

New Oxford Notes: July-August 2014

A Manufactured Controversy