Volume > Issue > Love on Trial

Love on Trial

NEW OXFORD NOTEBOOK

By Pieter Vree | December 2020
Pieter Vree is Editor of the NOR.

The coronavirus shutdowns put much of life on pause. They postponed weddings and baptisms, vacations and travel, and, in some locales, even home sales and evictions.

The shutdowns also put off a landmark canonical trial in the Episcopal Church.

Back in April of this year, William Love, Episcopal bishop of Albany, New York, was to present himself before a hearing panel for “failing to abide by the promises and vows made when he was ordained.”

What was Bishop Love’s canonical crime? Did he misappropriate money donated for charitable purposes or otherwise defraud the diocese? Did he deny the divinity of Christ or otherwise disparage the Creed? Did he carry on an extramarital affair or otherwise engage in sexual misconduct?

Nope. None of the above.

Bishop Love was to go on trial for refusing to allow same-sex marriage rites in his diocese.

At the Episcopal Church’s 79th General Convention in 2018, the House of Deputies and the House of Bishops, by a combined vote of 200 to eight (plus five “divided” votes), overwhelmingly approved Resolution B012, also known as Marriage Rites for the Whole Church. This “historic resolution,” the official Episcopal News Service gleefully reported, gives “all Episcopalians…full access to two trial-use marriage rites for same-sex and opposite-sex couples” so they can be “married by their priests in their home churches” (July 13, 2018).

And so, as of 2018, it was Bishop Love’s responsibility to make same-sex marriage rites available to his flock. That he would not do so constituted, in the eyes of his church, a violation of the vows he made at his ordination — in 1992.

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

Two Dubious Anniversaries

Neither Lewis nor Eliot was willing to condemn all uses of artificial contraception, yet both had obvious concerns about the moral implications of its use.

Newman, an “Apostate”?

Arthur Schlesinger said the most "tenacious tradition of paranoic agitation in American history has been anti-Catholicism." This book is a product of it.

Why a Self-Indulgent Age Needs a Rough Religion

Penance is man’s pitiful part in cooperation with grace, an extreme method necessary to combat the difficulties posed by the passion and the pride of man.