Volume > Issue > Jean-Luc Godard: Low-Altitude Narcissism

Jean-Luc Godard: Low-Altitude Narcissism

A CINEMATIC VIEW

By Robert E. Lauder | December 1984

Ed. Note: With this issue, we introduce a new column on films — A Cinematic View — which we expect to appear in ev­ery, or almost every, issue. Our regular film reviewer is the Rev. Robert E. Lauder, professor of Philosophy at Cathedral College in Douglaston, New York. He is the author of Loneliness Is for Loving and The Priest as Person, and his writings have appeared in various per­iodicals, from The New York Times to Commonweal and Homiletic & Pasto­ral Review.

 

The ex-enfant terrible of French cinema has done it again: Jean-Luc Godard has created a film that will draw strong reactions. First Name: Car­men will be hailed by loyal enthusiasts of the direc­tor’s work as another jewel in a marvelous mosaic of movies that Godard has turned out since 1959. But by those who find Godard an impossible-to-acquire taste, the film will be damned as Godard’s latest exercise in narcissistic filmmaking.

Critics have long been strongly divided in their appraisal of Godard’s work. Richard Roud, in addition to suggesting that Godard is the greatest contemporary director, has described him as one of the most important artists of our time. Pauline Kael has characterized Godard as “the most excit­ing director working in movies today.” However, as perceptive a cineaste as Stanley Kaufman has portrayed Godard as “a magician who makes elabo­rate uninspired gestures and then pulls out of the hat precisely nothing.”

What critics do seem to agree on is that Go­dard has been the most influential of contempo­rary directors. Probably the most original techni­cian of the cinema since Orson Welles, Godard — with his jump cuts, sound overlaps, and conversa­tions with the camera — has spawned a generation of imitators. Whether one is exulted or exasperated by Godard’s cinematic techniques, no one will de­ny that Godard is innovative. Prior to Godard no director would dream of cutting from the back of an actress’s head to the back of the same head. In Godard’s first feature length film, Breathless (1959), he did it 18 times.

Though the conventional wisdom is that cam­eras are supposed to record rather than call atten­tion to themselves, Godard’s camera in an impor­tant scene in My Life to Live (1962) swings back and forth like a pendulum. These startling tech­niques and tricks are among the key reasons why viewers either love or hate a Godard film. Even those who find Godard’s unique style and tech­nique arbitrary and distracting recognize the power of some of his scenes. I think of the traffic jam in Weekend (1968) and the display of the warriors’ loot at the end of the pacifist fable Les Carabiniers (1963).

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

Is God a Cloud? Does She Have Breasts?

An ecumenical film consortium has produced a new video series in which noted “experts” grapple with the great questions about God and man.

Bringing the Gospels Back to the Big Screen

Hollywood knows there's a lucrative market for Christian movies -- as demonstrated by The Passion of the Christ, the modern-day gold standard for biblical screen portrayals -- and studios have big plans to cash in.

Walker Percy: The Man & the Movie

Walker Percy would have liked the location of the Second Annual Percy Symposium held on…