Fundamentalists and Abortion
HOW STRONG A PRO-LIFE STANCE DOES 'SCRIPTURE ALONE' YIELD?
Ed. Note: Given that there is no explicit condemnation of abortion in the Bible — while there is such in the Catholic tradition — we have been a bit puzzled as to how the sola Scriptura (Scripture alone) premise of fundamentalist Protestants can yield a strong prolife stance akin to that of Catholics. We have also wondered if fundamentalists unconsciously rely on the Catholic tradition to draw out the implications in Scripture. We asked Prof. Gary Crum, a co-founder of Southern Baptists for Life and a member of the Board of Directors of the Christian Life Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, to explain the biblical reasoning most fundamentalists bring to the question of abortion. The results follow. As usual, comments from readers are welcome.
The ranks of the prolife movement have in recent years been swelled by conservative Protestants, and many people express curiosity about the road by which these evangelicals and fundamentalists have reached a prolife position.
Fundamentalists are those who believe that the Bible is without error, and they typically take a sola Scriptura approach in deciding God’s will, depending on the Holy Spirit to give them the correct interpretation of Scripture. (Evangelicals take a similar view, pointing to Scripture as the only rule of faith, but not all evangelicals would say that Scripture is necessarily without error at all points.)
Can a strong prolife view really be logically produced by reading Scripture alone? Is not a church hierarchy and lengthy theological tradition necessary to answer such a moral question in a definitive fashion? How could Scripture be tied together to produce a conclusion in the fundamentalist’s mind, seeing that there is nowhere in the Bible a definitive statement: “Abortion is murder”?
Enjoyed reading this?
READ MORE! GET A FREE 7 DAY TRIALSUBSCRIBE TODAY
You May Also Enjoy
In a recent issue of the Minnesota Christian Chronicle, Doug Trouten documented the Minneapolis Star…
Why is it wrong to abort unborn female babies because they are female, and not wrong to abort those who just happen to be female?
The consistent ethic does not demand that everyone become a dilettante who dabbles a bit in every political issue involving human life.