Volume > Issue > Capitalist Self-Seeking or Christian Self-Denial?

Capitalist Self-Seeking or Christian Self-Denial?


By L. Brent Bozell | October 1986
L. Brent Bozell is a writer in Washington, D.C. In 1960 he ghostwrote Barry Goldwater’s book The Conscience of a Conservative. But from 1961 to 1963 he lived in Spain, and his views changed from a libertarian conservatism to a traditionalist and more religious conservatism. In 1966 he founded Triumph magazine to articulate those views. Since the folding of Triumph in the mid-1970s, his views have developed further, as evidenced by this article. With this issue of the NOR, he joins us as a Contributing Editor.

Recently, I was asked by this magazine to elaborate on a short letter I wrote to National Re­view (May 15, 1981) on the subject of Mr. George Gilder. I had indicted Gilder, a prominent advocate of unmitigated capitalism, for being something less than Christian: the policies he was promoting would “discourage a conscious effort to achieve the common good — or social justice”; they would “sacramentalize self-interest, even greed.” More­over, Gilder was making “war against the develop­ment of virtue as the goal of the public life.” To the contrary, I suggested, “Christianity’s first rules of social, as well as interior, conduct are self-denial and sacrifice.” It seemed to me that Gilder’s views revealed the difficulty for Catholics — for Chris­tians — of subscribing to conservative economic principles.

Anyhow, I agreed to explore that difficulty further in these pages. Some time went by before a car journey took me from Massachusetts to New Jersey along the New York thruway. I said a rosary en route — with one decade dedicated specifically to seeking the Virgin Mary’s help in figuring out how to begin this article. While that decade was be­ing said, the car zipped by a road sign, signaling the village of “Woodstock,” N.Y., the home in years past of Frank Meyer, my deceased friend and col­league on National Review. Meyer, I then instantly remembered, had been my foe over 20 years before in an exchange which bore directly on the Gilder letter. I had initiated the exchange in an article called “Freedom or Virtue?” (National Review, Sept. 11, 1962), and it now seemed logical, after that signal, that I should summon that article as an introduction to current Catholic reflections on conservative economics.

“Freedom or Virtue?” was written in the summer of 1962. I hoped it would have a forma­tive role in the burgeoning conservative movement then pointing to the presidential candidacy of Bar­ry Goldwater in 1964. I argued, in fine, that the first responsibility of a political order is to help men be good, not to help them be free. I said that the “freedom first” or “libertarian” version of con­servatism ignored the truth that “moral freedom is beyond the reach of politics” — that the choice be­tween virtue and sin can be made equally well in civil freedom, in prison, or behind the Iron Cur­tain. We “traditionalist” conservatives, I went on, would not hesitate to restrict freedom where the restriction would be an inducement to virtue and would nurture the good Christian life. I was begin­ning to suspect then (as I affirm now) that the first purpose of politics — of the public life, that is, as well as of the interior life — is to help men get into Heaven.

I also had occasion in that article to comment on the newly born Young Americans for Free­dom’s founding Statement regarding economics: “‘the market economy [the YAFers announced] is the single economic system compatible with the requirements of personal freedom’ — which means, since personal freedom is the end-all, that the mar­ket economy itself, in the words of the Statement’s preamble, is an ‘eternal truth.’” I dissented from this position, asserting that both the free market and the satisfaction of man’s material wants are subordinate to virtue. I said that economic sys­tems, as well as political systems, should be arrang­ed so as to make virtue easier.

Enjoyed reading this?



You May Also Enjoy

The Cathedral of Business

Where we drift as a culture is determined more by the decisions of corporate managers -- and the values that dictate their decisions -- than by any other single influ­ence.

Neither Statism nor Individualism

If we are to subject all our being, thinking, and living to Christ and His Church, we cannot ignore the existence of Catholic social teaching.

The Americanization of the Globe

It is in the economic and political interests of the U.S. to ensure the world’s common language is English, and common standards are American.