Volume > Issue > Bertrand Russell: Prophet of the New World Order

Bertrand Russell: Prophet of the New World Order

"THERE IS A FIERCE HATE IN ME"

By David J. Peterson | June 2000
David J. Peterson is the author of Revoking the Moral Order: The Ideology of Positivism and the Vienna Circle.

In many ways, what the Englishman Bertrand Russell stood for characterizes the ideas and forces of the 20th century which have emerged triumphant today. Despite his reputation as a mathematician and philosopher of science, Russell is known primarily for his work as a social philosopher and advocate of world peace. Depending on your viewpoint, he may have been one of the greatest peacemakers of the epoch or one of its greatest villains.

Bertrand Russell was born in 1872. His public career began in 1900, and spanned seven decades until he died in 1970. He was a primary leader and spokesman for one of the great philosophical movements of the early century. This movement consisted of physical and social scientists known as Positivists — also known as the Vienna Circle. Bertrand was the grandson of Lord John Russell, a Prime Minister of Great Britain under Queen Victoria. Bertrand’s official title was Viscount Amberley, the third Earl Russell. He was also a popular author who wrote on a wide range of topics such as culture, morality, and politics.

Russell popularized many of the new scientific currents. One of his most successful books, The ABC’s of Relativity, explained Einstein’s abstruse propositions about space and time for the layman; what millions of people knew as Einstein’s famous theories came from Russell’s book. He had a clear and readable style which got right to the heart of an issue. He is often compared as a philosopher to John Dewey but was a much superior writer. Although all the existing biographies of Russell provide much useful information, they overlook his darker side. The exception is a 1996 book by Raymond Monk which at least explores the man’s highly unstable psychology. The great activist and spokesman for world peace and disarmament was, on closer inspection, something of a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.

Bertrand lost both father and mother at a very early age. In his sixth year he was placed in the home of his elderly grandmother. In his autobiography Russell complains bitterly about the stifling tyranny and repression he endured while living in her home. Unlike his older brother who rebelled and left home, little Bertie remained her pet, never openly defying his granny. He said he developed an overwhelming rage which, to keep the peace at home, he completely suppressed during his childhood. Whether his grandmother did him any harm is hard to say; however, there is no doubt he developed some serious psychological problems. In his autobiography he speaks about his plan to commit suicide as an adolescent, a plan which was abandoned when he realized it would mean never learning any more mathematics. Despite his great intellect he displayed the personality of an iconoclast and a misanthrope all his life. The primary motivation of Russell’s intellectual effort was the removal of cultural repression, which he attributed to traditional religion. He set his mind to the task of eliminating the influence of Christianity on Western culture.

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! GET A FREE 7 DAY TRIAL

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

You May Also Enjoy

The News You May Have Missed

Making Money off Marx... In the Way of Jesus... Finally, a Solution to Generation Snowflake's Chicken Anxiety... Death by Fossil Fuel... Protein of the Future... Rockin' Down the Highway... The Lighter Side of Pergolesi... Headwear in the Hideaway... Fit to Be Ty'd... Fear the Reaper... and more

Briefly: June 2004

Reviews of Genetic Engineering: Christian Values and Catholic Teaching by Paul Flaman... The Message of Heaven and Hell by Bruce Milne... Life, Liberty, and the Defense of Dignity by Leon R. Kass, M.D... Creed and Culture: A Touchstone Reader edited by James M. Kushiner... Callista: A Sketch of the Third Century by John Henry Cardinal Newman

Kant Was Wrong

According to Kant, we do not look upon the world as it is, but upon an appearance of the world projected by the structures of the human mind.