A Protestant Consideration of Natural Law
NATURAL RIGHTS, LIBERAL DEMOCRACY & THE RIGHT TO LIFE
Natural law is in ill repute today among both Protestants and liberal Catholics. It is based on human reason, which Protestants consider too corrupt to produce valid rules of human behavior, and it has things to say about sexual and reproductive morality which liberal Catholics tend to reject. Though I am a Protestant, yet I believe in natural law.
Protestants typically reject natural law for being tainted by sin. Thus Reinhold Niebuhr speaks with specific reference to natural law, of “the perennial corruptions of interest and passion which are introduced into any historical definition of even the most ideal and abstract moral principles.” The danger is particularly great, he says, “when the natural law defines not merely moral but also political principles.”
Niebuhr’s position is more extreme than that of the 16th-century Reformers. After all, the very Epistle to the Romans, on which they largely drew for their doctrine of justification by faith alone, contains the following language:
It is not by hearing the law, but by doing it, that men will be justified before God. When Gentiles who do not possess the law carry out its precepts by the light of nature, then, although they have no law, they are their own law, for they display the effect of the law inscribed on their hearts. Their conscience is called as witness, and their own thoughts argue the case on either side, against them or even for them, on the day when God judges the secrets of human hearts through Christ Jesus. (2:13-16, NEB)
Enjoyed reading this?
READ MORE! REGISTER TODAYSUBSCRIBE
You May Also Enjoy
The effort of the Church to come to terms with the modern world too often assumes that contemporary culture is neutral when, in fact, it is closed to the transcendent.
The hallmark of Catholic theology is that it insists on the concrete and resists the ethereal. Our beliefs are beliefs about reality.
Scientism is an attitude that fosters and promotes a seriously exaggerated — and hence distorted — estimation of the nature and the scope of science.