Volume > Issue > A Personalist Vision

A Personalist Vision


By James G. Hanink | March 1989
James G. Hanink is Associate Editor of the NOR and Profes­sor of Philosophy at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles.

Are those of us gathered round the NOR personalists? It seems to me that we are — or ought to be — personalists, and that the NOR would do well to declare itself such. This journal’s Editor finds this suggestion of mine a “brave” one, given the NOR’s aversion to labels (see the Nov. 1987 editoriab~ In­deed, he invites a full discussion of this very propos­al.

There is, of course, no question that the NOR, in addition to being ecumenical in spirit, is also firm­ly Catholic. So the issue of personalism is one that we need to explore from the heart of the Church.

Broadly taken, personalism is a social vision based on the transcendent dignity of the human per­son. A rough statement of such a vision is easy enough: persons flourish only in community, and community exists only insofar as it reverences per­sons. There is no finer expression of the Church’s presence in the struggle for authentic community than Vatican II’s pledge:

The joys and hopes, the griefs and the anxieties of the men of this age, especial­ly those who are poor or in any way af­flicted, these too are the joys and hopes, the griefs and anxieties of the followers of Christ. Indeed, nothing genuinely hu­man fails to raise an echo in their hearts (Gaudium et Spes, No. 1).

Nearly 25 years after Vatican II, these words have become familiar to us.

Enjoyed reading this?



You May Also Enjoy

Waiting for Ambrose

One of the prime characteristics of the Church in our time is an almost complete absence of discipline, even in dioceses led by good bishops.

Letter to the Editor: December 2001

Stratford Caldecot: I'm Not Soft on Abortion... An Apology Is Owed... Theft Begets Terror... New Campuses Springing Up... Not the Magisterium, But the Holy Spirit...