Volume > Issue > Is Everyone Evil — or, Deep Down, Is Everyone Good?

Is Everyone Evil — or, Deep Down, Is Everyone Good?

THE CAMP OF CYNICS VS. THE CAMP OF UTOPIANS

By J. Budziszewski |
J. Budziszewski is Professor of Government and Philosophy at the University of Texas at Austin. Among his twenty books are What We Can’t Not Know, How to Stay Christian in College, How and How Not to Be Happy, On the Meaning of Sex, The Line Through the Heart, The Revenge of Conscience, and a series of line-by-line commentaries on St. Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae. This article is excerpted from his recently released Pandemic of Lunacy: How to Think Clearly When Everyone Around You Seems Crazy and is reprinted with the permission of the publisher, Creed & Culture (creedandculture.com).

Because this is to be asserted in general of men, that they are ungrateful, fickle, false, cowardly, covetous, and as long as you succeed they are yours entirely; they will offer you their blood, property, life, and children, as is said above, when the need is far distant; but when it approaches they turn against you. — Niccolò Machiavelli, The Prince

A glass is good, and a lass is good,
And a pipe to smoke in cold weather;
The world is good, and the people are good,
And we’re all good fellows together
. — Anonymous

How is it with us: Is human nature good? We seem to want a simple “Yes” or “No.” Evidence for “No” is found in the fact that we often behave dreadfully. Priests who hear confessions will tell you that nothing surprises them. C.S. Lewis asked his readers whether they could go for a week without a base thought or urge. No? How about a day? Still no? How about an hour? I’ve asked the question myself, going as far as, “How about fifteen minutes?” No one yet has told me he could do it. Lewis himself doesn’t conclude that people are just plain bad — but many do. Commenting on the declining birth rate, one writer describes the spirit of the age as “civilizational sadness,” “a belief that we’re just not good or that humans were a mistake.”1

But on the “Yes” side, we do good things, too. Most of us have experienced kindness and friendship. Once past adolescence, most of us are deeply grateful to our parents. Isn’t it good that we can recognize and desire good? In some sense, isn’t it good just to be? And although we can do dreadful things, isn’t it good that we are sometimes sorry and try to make amends?

Facts like these require a complex answer to the question “Is human nature good?” But we want to keep it simple. The same urge to simplify rings through contemporary music. “I believe most people are good,” sings country-and-western performer Luke Bryan, “and most mamas oughta qualify for sainthood.”2 Does this include the Hamas mamas who cheered on their sons in their mission of rape, mutilation, and beheading? Dave Gahan of the synth-pop group Depeche Mode goes to the opposite extreme, singing that when he tells himself people are good, he’s “fooling himself.”3 I’ve never heard a pop musician sing, “The answer is nuanced.”

Traveling east, we find that classical Chinese thinkers also tended to offer a simple “Yes” or “No,” and the lines their thoughts followed were much like ours. The two poles of opinion are well represented by Mencius, who thought our nature good, and Xunzi (or Hsün Tzu), who thought it thoroughly evil.

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

Why the Physical Resurrection of Christ Is So Believable

Jesus' empty tomb and repeated appearances eventually convinced the at first incredulous disciples and sent them forth to boldly proclaim the Gospel.

Standing Seldom by the Crib, But Often by the Coffin

As we bury our parents and watch our circle of family diminish, will we finally humble ourselves before God and ask forgiveness for rejecting the gifts He had to give us?

To Plot or to Personalize?

While Operation Rescue is, ultimately, rendered in Lawl­er's work as a tactic, it is still rendered as a tactic with a high goal.