“Thou Shalt Not Be Judgmental” & Other Postmodernist Notions
THE REGRESSION TO BARBARISM
Some say postmodernism defies definition. They are right. The word is a catchall for a hodgepodge of ideas and sentiments, some worthwhile, some seriously flawed, some bizarre. Postmodernism, in my view, is a transition period between the modern era, which is ending, and the next phase of history, whatever that will be.
It is impossible to draw precise boundaries between eras, but it is generally accepted that the modern age began in the 1600s, and I would predict that the transition through what we are calling postmodernism will not be complete for another century. During this time we will be engaged in the messy business of revising our worldview. In ordinary language, that’s our conception of what the world is really like; in postmodernese, it’s our “meta-narrative.” Many ideas and values and principles are vying with one another to become the governing themes of the next historical period, each promoted by academics, gurus, publishers, marketers, pundits, and would-be culture-framers of every stripe. How does one sort through it all?
To me the salient principle, which this article illustrates, is that postmodernism as we know it today is composed essentially of extreme reactions to the perceived extremes of modernism. Listed below are some comparisons between excessive modern and excessive postmodern doctrines. Not everyone in the modern period, of course, espoused extreme philosophical positions, nor is every postmodernist characterized by extremism. But a display of the extremes of each camp may aid us in understanding where we now are.
Enjoyed reading this?
READ MORE! REGISTER TODAYSUBSCRIBE
You May Also Enjoy
China could well be poised to inherit the earth that the U.S. once commanded — especially if our comparative student bodies are any indication.
Why is it that gay and lesbian students enjoy special protection from harassment while religious students do not?
Social Justice Warriors behave like cult members. They are little Cromwells who demand Robespierre-level ideological purity of every single person.