The Muscular & Visionary Pope
VANQUISHING THE EAST — NEXT THE WEST?
In the summer of 1976 I visited John Cardinal Wright, a friend since my youth, at his apartment near the Vatican. I had been a college student and he had been Auxiliary Bishop of Boston when I first knew him in what now seems like another age, when the Church was very imperfect but its norms were respected by the faithful and family life was still largely intact, and when even in secular society the Church as an institution inspired awe. John Wright went on to become Bishop of Worcester and then of Pittsburgh before being made a cardinal and Prefect of the Sacred Congregation of the Clergy in 1969. As an American bishop he was recognized as the leading intellectual in the U.S. hierarchy, and something of a liberal in social matters. Throughout the 1970s his letters to me made obvious his increasing anger at the doctrinal confusion and collapse of discipline in the Church. During our reunion in Rome in 1976 I found him a deeply unhappy man, and ill.
Cardinal Wright suffered from a degenerative disease that affected his hands and his ability to walk. Urbane, delightfully witty, highly cultured, kind, compulsively generous, and a bit vain, he had dreamed since youth of the Sacred Purple, but when it was finally conferred it did not bring joy. He told me of how terribly he missed his old diocese, of how he hated playing “second fiddle” to Paul VI’s closest advisers, with whom he quarreled. But most of all, what saddened him (as it saddened Paul VI, drove him to fits of weeping) was the state of the Church: the disorder among clergy and laity, the Church’s loss of a clear identity in the wake of the dashed hopes of Vatican II.
As I listened to the Cardinal, I relived my own disillusion. Like so many educated Roman Catholics of my generation, I had become theologically “liberal” during and just after Vatican II, in the belief that by accommodating freely to the temper of the modern world the Church might lessen the anguish of humanity in this life and advance her mission of salvation for the next. In the early 1970s a prominent American publication sent me to the Netherlands to write an article about the Dutch Church. The experience became a crux. I was horrified.
Generally, I found the Dutch Church so anxious to converge with the modern world that acceptance of artificial contraception, abortion, and premarital sex and homosexual marriage (so long as “love” and “commitment” were present) was increasingly common among theologians and laity alike. Ageless doctrines, such as the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist, were being explained away by Dutch theologians. The Dutch seemed resolved to remove all the mysteries and ambiguities of ultramontane Catholicism, and, with their Nordic fixation on legality, to align theory with behavior. They wished to end the classic tension between doctrine and the world.
Enjoyed reading this?
READ MORE! REGISTER TODAYSUBSCRIBE
You May Also Enjoy
Of the current American pastimes, few are more depressing than listening to the debates over…
People whose ideological forebears fought so hard to keep religion out of the public sphere are now flying Tibetan prayer flags.
Is it ever appropriate to change human nature, even if ostensibly for the sake of improving the quality of life for a great many people?