Volume > Issue > The Consequences of Ending 'Discrimination' Against Homosexuals

The Consequences of Ending ‘Discrimination’ Against Homosexuals


By Kenneth D. Whitehead | December 2010
Kenneth D. Whitehead is a former U.S. Assistant Secretary of Education. His most recent books are Affirming Religious Freedom: How Vatican Council II Developed the Church's Teaching to Meet Modern Needs (St. Paul's/Alba House, 2010) and The Renewed Church: The Second Vatican Council's Enduring Teaching about the Church (Sapientia Press of Ave Maria University, 2009).

On October 12, 2010, Virginia A. Phillips, a U.S. district judge in Riverside, California, issued an injunction against the enforcement by the U.S. military of the law authorizing the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. This policy dictates that homosexuals are not to reveal their “sexual orientation” since open homosexuals are precluded from military service under the law. Judge Phillips found this to be discriminatory and hence she ruled that the ban on open homosexuals in the military “infringed on the fundamental rights” of gay and lesbian members of the armed forces. The Department of Defense (DOD) promptly announced that the court’s decision would be “obeyed,” and the current ban on service by open homosexuals no longer enforced.

Both the existing policy, as well as the current law behind it (now judged to be discriminatory), were considered compromise solutions at the time they were put in place in the early 1990s. President Bill Clinton had tried but failed to allow open homosexuals to serve in the military, and the present law was put in place instead. The resulting compromise policy, however, continued to be controversial. Homosexual rights groups have never ceased to agitate against it, while on the other side hundreds of retired generals and admirals have publicly warned that acceptance of open homosexuals in the military would disrupt military effectiveness, particularly unit cohesion.

The pressures to do away with the ban have nevertheless continued to be intense. At least one previous court decision called for the reinstating of an officer who was dismissed because she was a lesbian. In late September, just days before Judge Phillips issued her injunction, an attempt to repeal the law by means of an amendment added to the current DOD appropriations bill failed to garner a sufficient number of votes in the Senate (after having been approved by the House).

Both during his campaign for the presidency and after taking office, President Barack Obama has plainly indicated his opposition to the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. His favored method for abolishing it, however, was by means of repeal legislation. As he explained at an MTV forum, “This is not a situation where with the stroke of pen I can end the policy.” Not even the Obama administration wanted to see the law annulled by an injunction issued by a single federal district court. Upon assuming control of the White House, the Obama administration ordered a DOD study on the consequences of making the change, after which a judicious decision was presumably going to be made. This study was to be completed by December 2010.

Enjoyed reading this?



You May Also Enjoy

Briefly Reviewed: June 1984

Clear and Present Danger: Church and State in a Post-Christian America... Pope John Paul II and the Family... The Christian Trinity in History: Studies in Historical Theology, Vol. I... Blaze of Recognition: Through the Year with Thomas Merton: Daily Meditations

Fasting: A Personal Witness

Religious fasting is a work of the Holy Spirit and must be done in the right spirit. One benefit is charitable, that is, the good it can do for others.

The News You May Have Missed

Prohibition, Persian Style... Church of St. Cinderella?... The Plaintiff Is a Monkey... Poetic Justice... Radical Grammatical Error... Singing ISIS to Sleep... Miniskirt Solidarity... Extreme Makeover, Concentration Camp Edition... Alternative Financial Aid... Saving Homeless Jesus... and more