The Catholic Bishops & the Political Theory of Philanthropy
THE SECOND DRAFT OF THE PASTORAL ON THE ECONOMY
One of the effects of modern life’s extreme specialization is to make attempts to see things whole suspect to the cognoscenti, who stamp the seal of legitimacy on ideas currently in circulation. When non-practitioners of the academic specialty known as “economics” have the temerity to make judgments about “the economy,” they are in for a cool reception from the certifiers of “sound” thought in the media and universities.
It came as no surprise, then, that the nation’s Roman Catholic bishops were widely lambasted as economic quacks or religious authoritarians or both, for issuing their first draft of their pastoral letter on the American economy. Eleven months later, in October 1985, they issued a second draft, largely neglected by the media. (The final version is expected in November 1986.) The second draft is less inspiring than the first and reads in places more like a committee report than a challenge to metanoia (change of heart). Nonetheless, enough of the language and spirit of the remarkable first draft remains to make it possible to treat both drafts as a single document conveying a coherent political theory.
What is political theory? The same cognoscenti referred to above, having absorbed the fact/value dichotomy regnant in the social sciences, tend to view political theory either as opinionated “ideology” (an “ism” of the “left” or “right”) or as a set of hypotheses to “guide” social scientific research. In the latter case, one can of course have “theories,” but they are more likely to be hypotheses testable according to the rules of abstract schematic methodologies than they are to be philosophical world views. “Theory” in this “scientific” sense is accepted and even commended by the cognoscenti because it defines what is “relevant” in the language of the prevailing ethos. That ethos happens to extol acquisitiveness.
When I say that the Catholic bishops present a “coherent political theory,” I am using “theory” in its original sense. The Greek word theoria came from theorein meaning “to see.” With the development of philosophy, Plato and Aristotle meant by theory above all a form of “inward” seeing. In the Parable of the Cave in Plato’s Republic, the philosopher-theorist “sees” the true Sun, the Idea of the Good, only after having acquired a new character by inwardly turning himself around. Plato contended that only through metanoia, or a kind of intellectual and spiritual change of orientation, could a person recognize reality for what it is.
Enjoyed reading this?
READ MORE! GET A FREE 7 DAY TRIALSUBSCRIBE TODAY
You May Also Enjoy
In his book review in the April NOR, Dale Vree asked rhetorically, “Who is God…
Review of Catholic Social Teaching: An Historical Perspective by Roger Aubert, edited by David A. Boileau
I am still struggling with the phenomenon of the so-called underclass — struggling with the…