Volume > Issue > St. Cyprian on Schism: A Patristic Reality Check

St. Cyprian on Schism: A Patristic Reality Check


By David D. Jividen | May 2017
David D. Jividen, an Air Force veteran and perpetually professed member of the Fraternity of St. Dominic (a.k.a. Third Order), has a Master's in Moral Theology from Christendom College. He also has a Master's in Law from Harvard and a Doctorate of Law from the University of Cincinnati. A career military judge advocate, he served more than twenty years of active duty in a variety of legal positions, the last of which was as an attorney on the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Mr. Jividen has written on a wide variety of topics, including an article for the Encyclopedia of the Spanish-American and Philippine-American Wars on the "Role of the Vatican," as well as numerous legal articles. He currently works as an attorney for the federal government. The views and opinions expressed or implied in this article are those solely of the author and should not be construed as those of the Departments of Justice, Defense, or any other agency or department of the U.S. government.

Patristics, the study of the writings of the early Church Fathers, is a valuable tool. It enables Christians to perform reality checks with regard to certain popular beliefs or tenets. This patristic check is critical in order to weed out theological innovations that, although intellectually attractive, may directly conflict with the faith as handed down from Christ through the Apostles from the earliest days of Christianity.

The writings of St. Cyprian (A.D. 200-258) provide one such check. Born into a wealthy pagan family in North Africa, Cyprian led a dissipated life before converting to Christianity at the age of thirty-five. In short order, he was made a priest and then elected bishop of Carthage around A.D. 248. During this period, he became familiar with the theology of Tertullian, who did not believe that God’s forgiveness extended to those who abjured their Christian faith during the Roman persecutions.

In the mysterious ways of God’s providence, Cyprian ascended to the bishop’s throne just prior to two of these Roman persecutions — those of Emperor Decius (A.D. 250) and Emperor Valerian (A.D. 257-258). Cyprian chose to flee Carthage during Decius’s reign so that he could continue to lead the Church, causing resentment among some of his priests. Upon his return to Carthage, Cyprian encountered a Church divided on the question of what to do with the Christians who had “fallen away,” or renounced the faith, during Decius’s persecution and now sought to return to the fold. They were known as the lapsi (the lapsed or fallen). Cyprian’s remedy veered from the path chosen by Novatian, a Tertullian-inspired anti-pope whose reluctance to forgive the lapsi led him out of the Church. Novatian established his own rival sect based on this rigorist mentality and consecrated his own bishops throughout Christendom. Cyprian, on the other hand, although severe, was not inflexible; he granted the lapsi the possibility of forgiveness after they demonstrated “exemplary repentance,” including public acts of penance.

Cyprian delivered De Ecclesiae Catholicae Unitate (“On the Unity of the Church”) during a council he convened in A.D. 251 to counter the Novatians and settle the controversy over the reconciliation of the lapsi. This treatise is a fascinating early pastoral exposition in which a sitting bishop directly addresses schism, including how dissidents can insinuate themselves among the faithful, how Christians can avoid falling into schism, and how separation from the Church is a worse offense than the actions of the lapsi. St. Cyprian’s tone throughout the document is measured yet firm. Those who read “On the Unity of the Church” today can profit from Cyprian’s thoughts and reflections, which, although ancient, are as valid now as they were when he first inked them. This is true especially for nominal Catholics who refuse to assent to Catholic faith and morals, and others who, out of ignorance or hurt, have abandoned the Barque of Peter for unseaworthy vessels of other faiths.

Enjoyed reading this?



You May Also Enjoy

Darwinian Devolution

If most mutations warp or destroy what’s already in the DNA of an organism, where’s the step-by-step pathway upward to the new and improved versions?

American Catholics: Unclear on the Concepts

Are American Catholics dense? That seemed, at first blush, to be the underlying message delivered by Peter Kodwo Appiah Cardinal Turkson.

Briefly: March 1996

Reviews of St. Francis of Assisi: Writings for a Gospel Life... Teresa of Avila: Mystical Writings... Francis de Sales: Finding God Wherever You Are... The Recovery of the Sacred: Reforming the Reformed Liturgy... The Diversity of Religions: A Christian Perspective...