Salvaging Patriotism from the Narrow Nationalist
RESCUING TOLERANCE FROM THE ROOTLESS INTELLECTUAL
I remember the occasion well. It was a crisp summer evening long ago in Boulder, Colorado. A friend and I took in a guest lecture at the University of Colorado. The speaker, a confident, even smug British intellectual by the name and title of Sir Julian Huxley, scion of a well?known family, pronounced an anathema against the nasty superstitions of mankind — religion, nationalism, and atavisms of all sorts. He even predicted that within two decades — by 1984, curiously — religion would disappear altogether, simply evaporate in the wake of spreading Enlightenment. The oddity of national loyalty might linger just a bit longer.
I am pleased to report that I was skeptical.
Religion, of course, remains very much with us. Academics often have trouble acknowledging this. One might respond to their insouciance in this matter with Freud’s quip, “Theory is good but it doesn’t prevent things from existing.” Islam forcefully shapes the lives of hundreds of millions. The changes in eastern Europe are unthinkable without considering the moral power of Roman Catholicism. Eastern Orthodoxy is alive and well in Russia. Protestantism of the fundamentalist and charismatic sort is growing in Latin America. Indeed, religious forces of numerous varieties are profoundly affecting politics and society in countless areas of the world. Sir Julian Huxley, R.I.P.
If the academy ignores religion at its peril, and in the interest of promoting orthodoxies of its own, it does pay some attention to nationalism — but mostly in a tone best described as hand-wringing. For one of the signs of the rationalist orthodoxy is a marked disdain for particularist loyalties. Surely human beings will grow up and overcome these things! As everyone knows, such confidence in the overcoming of nationalism caught intellectuals and the Left altogether unprepared for World War I and scarcely less well-equipped for many conflicts since.
Enjoyed reading this?
READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY
SUBSCRIBEYou May Also Enjoy
Here we review Cyborg Mind: What Brain-Computer and Mind-Cyberspace Interfaces Mean for Cyberneuroethics.
When John Paul II and Benedict XVI commanded the chair of Peter, conservative and orthodox Catholics knew the pope and Magisterium were their 'court of last appeal.' That privilege now belongs to liberal Catholics.
Carl Sagan’s immanent nihilism is premised on the seemingly conflicting notions that mankind is nothing and yet everything, simultaneously.