January 2002
Frank Dialogue Needed
I found David Stolinsky’s article, “‘Except Jews'” (Oct.) deeply depressing. What a sad, frantic, one-sided, Manichean, embarrassingly self-delusional defense of Jews. If only he gave the Palestinians a tiny bit of credit for trying to exist.
Alas, Stolinsky is right about much, but only about part of a much bigger picture. The other part is covered by Noam Chomsky, Norman Finkelstein, Ron David, and Barbara Lubin, all members of the “Jewish faith” who point out persuasively that Israeli policies and their supporters are not totally justified, are actually self-destructive, and should be evaluated as objectively and thoroughly as anyone else’s.
What we all need now is some frank dialogue that allows one to critically evaluate Israel’s policies without being labeled anti-Semitic (or self-hating if one is Jewish), without starting off with the Crusades, the Inquisition, and Pope Pius XII, and without being required to assume beforehand that all historical blame is on one side.
Perhaps the NOR, the gutsiest of the journalistic pack, can get this dialogue going. It would be better than fresh air. It would make us more honest, more understanding of each other, and hopefully defuse the terrible feelings of recrimination developing everywhere since the September 11 attack.
William Charlesworth
Stockholm, Wisconsin
You May Also Enjoy
A great irony of history is that in Roe v. Wade the Supreme Court announced its adherence to a prescientific concept of fetal life.
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals declared that the Pledge of Allegiance to the U.S. flag is unconstitutional in public schools because it includes the words “under God.”
There is no more chilling instance of government infringement on religious liberty than the government censoring what can or cannot be said from the pulpit.