Apropos the previous New Oxford Note, it’s time for one of those “smarty-pants” New Oxford Notes. The neoconservative National Catholic Register (Nov. 27-Dec. 3, 2005) has a kill-the-insurgents editorial disguised as the lead front-page news story.
The story begins with a softball question. A Catholic soldier in Iraq killed an insurgent, and he asks, “Will I burn in hell?” He thinks it’s a violation of the Fifth Commandment, “Thou shalt not kill.”
Of course, every Catholic should know that the Commandment does not forbid “killing”; it forbids murder. If the Catholic soldier really thought it outlawed “killing,” why was he serving in Iraq and why did he join the military in the first place?
The story includes an interview with pro-war Judy McCloskey from an online support group for Catholics fighting in Iraq. She complains, according to the story, that “some Catholic ethicists have confused the issue.” Well, yes, Catholic ethicists such as Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger (now Pope Benedict XVI), but they have hardly “confused” the issue, in fact they have clarified it, for both of them pronounced the war on Iraq to be unjust.
Enjoyed reading this?
READ MORE! REGISTER TODAYSUBSCRIBE
You May Also Enjoy
Does it make sense to include moral questions when considering or conducting or evaluating military…
U.S. troops should be President Bush's bedrock of support for his war in Iraq, but an astounding 46% of American soldiers do not approve.
If the Seamless Garment links the sparing of innocent human life with the sparing of guilty human life (the murderer or invader of the household or the invader of the country) then the Garment is full of seams.