Volume > Issue > Fellini Back in Stride

Fellini Back in Stride


By Robert E. Lauder | June 1986

When in the 1960s I first became interested in film as a serious art form, three author/directors symbolized for me the power of film: Michelange­lo Antonioni, Ingmar Bergman, and Federico Fellini. The work of these extraordinarily skilled filmmakers was exceptional. When a new film by one of them appeared, it was a “must-see.” But I won­der if in the last 20 years the nihilistic view of An­tonioni has worked against his own creativity. His cinematic output has dwindled, and since The Pas­senger (1973) Antonioni has not created anything significant. Bergman, who may be the greatest screen artist of all times, recently announced that he had made his last film. That leaves the Italian neo-realist.

The hopeful humanism of Fellini has created a marvelous corpus of film. I think of I Vitelloni (1953), Nights of Cabiria (1956), La Strada (1954), La Dolce Vita (1959), (1963), The Clowns (1970). Within Fellini’s body of work there are brilliant scenes that have dazzled moviegoers, and touching moments that have deepened their sense of the human mystery. Among my favorite Fellini moments I think of Zampano (Anthony Quinn), in La Strada, washing himself at the beach in a symbolic baptism after he recognizes his sins; of the clown (Richard Basehart) in La Strada tell­ing Gelsomina (Giuletta Masina) that her role in life may be to help Zampano; of the joyous ring of friendship at the end of ; and of the two clowns descending the stairs at the end of The Clowns. In , which I think is a masterpiece, Fellini tried the nearly impossible — capturing a person’s psyche on celluloid, and to some extend he succeeded.

In recent years I have been disappointed with Fellini. Films such as Casanova (1977), Orchestra Rehearsal (1979), and City of Women (1981), made me wonder if the genius was on the decline.

Ginger and Fred, while not a masterpiece, re­veals that the master can still create exceptional cinema. An artist who apparently works very much from his feelings and intentions, Fellini turns his camera on people and lovingly watches their foi­bles and failures. There is nothing even remotely resembling a judgmental stance in a Fellini film. Obviously in love with his characters, Fellini years ago made a comment that can only apply to Ginger and Fred: “Concerning my characters who are al­ways so unhappy, the only thing that I could there­fore offer them would be my solidarity.” That is what comes across beautifully in the best Fellini films, and it comes across beautifully in Ginger and Fred.

Enjoyed reading this?



You May Also Enjoy

The Vatican’s Filthy Lucre

Peter’s Pence doesn’t solicit funds for financial speculation that fattens the Vatican’s investment portfolios; the fund shouldn’t be used that way.

A Nation of Narcissists?

Can a nation, or a civilization, continue to prosper if it is peopled mainly by narcissists? I doubt that this has ever been tried before in history.

Peering Into the Abyss

Evil's baneful effects may be likened to the invisible, odorless, and deadly radiation emitted by uranium. One must 'put on the armor of God' to resist it.