Volume > Issue > Note List > All Power to The (Smart) People

All Power to The (Smart) People

Dorothy Day was fond of saying that “Beauty will save the world” (a paraphrase of Dostoyevsky). That’s quite an exaggeration, but we get the drift. Although it’s said that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, it would be hard for anyone to look at a photo of the young Dorothy Day and deny that she was one beautiful dame. And she was hecka smart too.

The problem is that most of us aren’t both physically attractive and intelligent. The hunks on the high-school football team and the cute, shapely cheerleaders who root them on seldom make the honor roll. Maybe God has arranged it so that if we don’t excel in brainpower or academics, we can excel in some other area.

But this seems to trouble Thomas J. McCarthy, writing in America (Oct. 16, 1999). He bemoans “our Barbie Doll culture,” saying that “when it comes to growing up” in such a culture, “girls have an uphill battle.” Sure, some do — but others don’t. He denounces the “male domination” of the world and charges that females are “too often…subject to evaluation…based on their looks.” (Men aren’t?) McCarthy would prefer that females be evaluated in terms of how “fleet of mind” they are. But in such an Egghead culture, some girls would still have an uphill battle — no, would probably face an unwinnable battle — for it’s much harder to enhance one’s I.Q. than one’s looks. Indeed, in such a culture, smarty-pants like McCarthy would be kings whereas girls sluggish of mind would be terminal peons.

McCarthy proceeds to take aim at the Miss America Pageant, which, he charges, destroys women’s “self-esteem” by encouraging them to “seek physical enhancement in order to please others.”

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

To Plot or to Personalize?

Review of Operation Rescue and Shattering the Darkness

Losing Our Religion

Distinctions between Baptist, Methodist, Lutheran, and Episcopalian carry less and less import to today's Protestants, as "nondenominationalism" and "none of the above" become more common responses on U.S. religion surveys.

Letter to the Editor: March 2002

May He Sit Alone... The "Real Lesson" of AIDS... What Those in Hell Have Already Said... Civil War Revisionism: No Thanks!... Novelty for the Sake Of Novelty... It's "Inclusive" Language That's "Needlessly Offensive"...