Volume > Issue > A Response to David Stolinsky on Pacifism

A Response to David Stolinsky on Pacifism

DON'T SWALLOW SNAKE OIL

By James G. Hanink | May 1997
James G. Hanink is Professor of Philosophy at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles.

Dr. Stolinsky’s “house calls” are always welcome. But it’s a mixed bag he’s carrying.

Make no mistake, he’s right about the patient being sick. There’s a moral silliness in the land about the use of force, and it’s compounded with a “double-standarditis.” Some folks have an acute case of it, and the bug’s contagious.

Take a closer look, though, at the medicines our friend’s toting in that bag of his. The best of them are generic. The worst are snake oil. Swallowed together, they might cure some problems, but they’ll exacerbate others. The truth is, well, we need stronger medicine.

What’s behind my caveat? OK, cards on the table. First, I’m an aspiring pacifist, so I don’t like pacifist-bashing. Second, Stolinsky’s stingy in citing Exodus. (Besides, St. Thomas does a better job getting at what’s at issue there.) Maybe that’s why the good doctor goes wrong with many of his domestic and foreign prescriptions.

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

Do You Despair Over the Current Crisis in the Church?

If the Church were merely a human institution, she would have collapsed long ago, as one earthly empire after another has collapsed during her history.

Letter to the Editor: November 2006

Stupid in Moral Matters... Does God Love Unrepentant Sinners... Is the Pope Above Criticism?... The Government Does Not Screw Things Up for the Super Rich... Co-operation in Evil... Can a Priest's Ordination Be Declared Invalid?... A Response from William Donohue...

Faith

Review of The Lytle-Tate Letters edited by Young & Sarcone, The Southern Vision of Andrew Lytle by Mark Lucas, and Close Connections by Ann Waldron