Volume > Issue > A Response to David Stolinsky

A Response to David Stolinsky


By James G. Hanink | May 1997
James G. Hanink is Professor of Philosophy at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles.

Dr. Stolinsky’s “house calls” are always welcome. But it’s a mixed bag he’s carrying.

Make no mistake, he’s right about the patient being sick. There’s a moral silliness in the land about the use of force, and it’s compounded with a “double-standarditis.” Some folks have an acute case of it, and the bug’s contagious.

Take a closer look, though, at the medicines our friend’s toting in that bag of his. The best of them are generic. The worst are snake oil. Swallowed together, they might cure some problems, but they’ll exacerbate others. The truth is, well, we

need stronger medicine.

What’s behind my caveat? OK, cards on the table. First, I’m an aspiring pacifist, so I don’t like pacifist-bashing. Second, Stolinsky’s stingy in citing Exodus. (Besides, St. Thomas does a better job getting at what’s at issue there.) Maybe that’s why the good doctor goes wrong with many of his domestic and foreign prescriptions.

Enjoyed reading this?



You May Also Enjoy

Why Orthodox Catholics Look to Zen

Hans Urs von Balthasar maintained that there have been two main competitors to the Catholic…

The Communist Era: Golden Age of Catholicism in Poland?

While the Church across Western Europe suffered reform gone wild, Poland was isolated enough to preserve her identity and fidelity.

Letter to the Editor: November 2016

Allah's Hunger for Human Flesh... Picking Nits... The Default Male Position... A Splendid Example... The Wrong Pope... Rational Self-Interest vs. Group-Centered Morality... Rights Talk: Prioritizing the Person... Birthplace of the Dodge... No Idle Pipe Dream... and more