Volume > Issue > A Response to David Stolinsky

A Response to David Stolinsky


By James G. Hanink | May 1997
James G. Hanink is Professor of Philosophy at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles.

Dr. Stolinsky’s “house calls” are always welcome. But it’s a mixed bag he’s carrying.

Make no mistake, he’s right about the patient being sick. There’s a moral silliness in the land about the use of force, and it’s compounded with a “double-standarditis.” Some folks have an acute case of it, and the bug’s contagious.

Take a closer look, though, at the medicines our friend’s toting in that bag of his. The best of them are generic. The worst are snake oil. Swallowed together, they might cure some problems, but they’ll exacerbate others. The truth is, well, we

need stronger medicine.

What’s behind my caveat? OK, cards on the table. First, I’m an aspiring pacifist, so I don’t like pacifist-bashing. Second, Stolinsky’s stingy in citing Exodus. (Besides, St. Thomas does a better job getting at what’s at issue there.) Maybe that’s why the good doctor goes wrong with many of his domestic and foreign prescriptions.

Enjoyed reading this?



You May Also Enjoy

New Oxford Notes: January-February 2017

The Cult of Diversity at Providence College... A "Climate of Fear" in the Vatican?

Bookmark: September 2003

Review of One Shepherd, One Flock by Oliver Barres...

The Image of God

As we try, in our troubles, to picture to ourselves who we are, we have recourse to the knowledge that God calls us to imitate Him and love as He loves.