Volume > Issue > A Response to David Stolinsky on Pacifism

A Response to David Stolinsky on Pacifism

DON'T SWALLOW SNAKE OIL

By James G. Hanink | May 1997
James G. Hanink is Professor of Philosophy at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles.

Dr. Stolinsky’s “house calls” are always welcome. But it’s a mixed bag he’s carrying.

Make no mistake, he’s right about the patient being sick. There’s a moral silliness in the land about the use of force, and it’s compounded with a “double-standarditis.” Some folks have an acute case of it, and the bug’s contagious.

Take a closer look, though, at the medicines our friend’s toting in that bag of his. The best of them are generic. The worst are snake oil. Swallowed together, they might cure some problems, but they’ll exacerbate others. The truth is, well, we need stronger medicine.

What’s behind my caveat? OK, cards on the table. First, I’m an aspiring pacifist, so I don’t like pacifist-bashing. Second, Stolinsky’s stingy in citing Exodus. (Besides, St. Thomas does a better job getting at what’s at issue there.) Maybe that’s why the good doctor goes wrong with many of his domestic and foreign prescriptions.

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

The Liberalism of Fools

Abortion and euthanasia are solidly on the side of the powerful at the expense of the power­less. Sadly, the liberal community came to rigidly em­brace it.

Letters to the Editor: September 2025

Love Where There Is No Love... A Failure of Formation of Fad-Followers... Does He Have Better Evidence?... Discerning Tongues... and more

Requiem for Evangelicalism?

"Evangelicalism doesn't need a bailout. Much of it needs a funeral." So writes Michael Spencer in a sobering article in The Christian Science Monitor.