A Response to David Stolinsky on Pacifism
DON'T SWALLOW SNAKE OIL
Dr. Stolinsky’s “house calls” are always welcome. But it’s a mixed bag he’s carrying.
Make no mistake, he’s right about the patient being sick. There’s a moral silliness in the land about the use of force, and it’s compounded with a “double-standarditis.” Some folks have an acute case of it, and the bug’s contagious.
Take a closer look, though, at the medicines our friend’s toting in that bag of his. The best of them are generic. The worst are snake oil. Swallowed together, they might cure some problems, but they’ll exacerbate others. The truth is, well, we need stronger medicine.
What’s behind my caveat? OK, cards on the table. First, I’m an aspiring pacifist, so I don’t like pacifist-bashing. Second, Stolinsky’s stingy in citing Exodus. (Besides, St. Thomas does a better job getting at what’s at issue there.) Maybe that’s why the good doctor goes wrong with many of his domestic and foreign prescriptions.
You May Also Enjoy
Love of neighbor may impel us to act like socialists, but we must not fall into the illusion that others' salvation is necessarily advanced from the charity shown them.
Topics surrounding the quantification and financialization of risk have considerable bearing on questions that affect society, both now and into the future.
I came to see that the Anglican schism of the sixteenth century, and the Protestant Reformation in general, did not reflect the original trajectory of the New Testament.