
A Response from Dale Vree
In a 1975 statement supporting gun control, the U.S. Catholic Conference said: “Most homicides are not the result of criminal design but rather they are the outcome of quarrels and arguments among spouses, friends, and acquaintances…. A recent study in the Cleveland area indicates guns purchased for protection resulted in the deaths of six times as many family members, friends, and neighbors as intruders or assailants.” In Seattle today, for every one household intruder shot, there are 37 suicides from guns (plus X number of homicides and accidental deaths). Nationwide, 10 children are killed each day from playing with loaded guns kept in households. In the 1980s four times as many Americans were killed by handguns as were killed in the Vietnam War.
But Sheldon Vanauken seems to be echoing the NRA and saying that that’s “the price we pay for freedom.” If so, we’re being swindled. The odds that America will come under the sway of some dictator are extremely remote, especially in these times when the dictator is becoming an endangered species. It makes more sense to worry about an auto accident: When Van trades in his Morgan convertible for a safer car, I’ll start worrying about coups and invasions.
While we wait for the “coming Caesar,” innocent people are dying because of easy access to guns. The real question is: What is the price we’re willing to pay to protect innocent human life? If “whittling away” at the constitutional right to bear arms is what it takes, that would seem to be a price worth paying — just as whittling away at the constitutional right to privacy would be a price worth paying to save the lives of unborn babies.
You May Also Enjoy
A central part of the Legion's response-- that "charges had already been thoroughly examined and found baseless"-- explains why three popes ignored the allegations.
When Newman speaks of his happy surprise at how objective and real he found the Catholic religion to be, he often refers to the Real Presence.
I fantasize that some contemporary Nathan the Prophet might chat with the President, not about sins like adultery and murder but about social sins. I’m afraid a Catholic bishop would not be right for the part.