A Clear Line
In June Pope John Paul II visited his beloved Poland. While it had been thought by many that he would, for reasons of prudence, have to keep his remarks rather general, the Pope made blunt comments about the curtailments of freedom in the country, and expressed his strong hope that agreements made in 1980 between the government and the Solidarity trade union movement would continue to be the basis for a viable peace. He also warned against foreign (obviously Soviet) intervention in Polish affairs, only a few weeks before Mehmet Ali Agca, who tried to assassinate John Paul in 1981, confirmed long-circulating rumors that the Russian K.G.B. helped organize the assassination attempt.
The Pope has been criticized by some because, while he demands that priests and religious “get out of politics,” he himself takes bold political stands where his homeland is concerned. Obviously, however, John Paul draws a clear line between holding office, which means being the servant of a particular government, and making moral judgments about politics. He does not forbid or discourage the latter.
As noted here last month, the Vatican gave an ultimatum to a Detroit nun who had accepted a state government post that required her to administer the public funding of abortion. Faced with the need to make a choice, she resigned from her religious community.
Enjoyed reading this?
READ MORE! REGISTER TODAYSUBSCRIBE
"Catholicism's Intellectual Prizefighter!"
- Karl Keating
Strengthen the Catholic cause.
SUPPORT NOR TODAYSUBSCRIBE
You May Also Enjoy
In the case of both the Latin Mass and the ordinariates, Pope Benedict's response was to revolutionize a policy put in place by his predecessor.
As for apologies to homosexuals, the saga of San Diego Bishop Robert Brom could be instructive.
Are we only drive-bound or are we at the constant call of drives yet able to be their sovereign: moral and spiritual masters of our particular lives?