Just War Criteria & the Crisis in the Persian Gulf
LETTER TO SECRETARY OF STATE JAMES BAKER
Ed. Note: On November 12, during its general meeting in Washington, D.C., the full body of Catholic bishops of the U.S. affirmed Archbishop Mahony’s letter (dated November 7) and made that letter its own statement. The entire text of the letter follows.
Dear Mr. President:
I write as Chairman of the International Policy Committee of the U.S. Catholic Conference to share several concerns and criteria regarding possible use of U.S. military force in the Persian Gulf. As Catholic bishops we are deeply concerned about the human consequences of the crisis — the lives already lost or those that could be lost in a war, the freedom denied to hostages, the victims of aggression, and the many families divided by the demands of military service. As religious teachers, we are concerned about the moral dimensions of the crisis — the need to resist brutal aggression, to protect the innocent, to pursue both justice and peace, as well as the ethical criteria for the use of force. As U.S. citizens, we are concerned about how our nation can best protect human life and human rights and secure a peaceful and just resolution to the crisis.
Our Conference has thus far emphasized five basic issues in addressing the crisis:
(1) The clear need to resist aggression. We cannot permit nations to simply overwhelm others by brutal use of force.
You May Also Enjoy
Jacobitism was a real threat to Protestant Ascendancy, and Irish bards kept alive the fervent hope for an imminent rescue from Europe.
Approximately 40 percent of all Russians are at least nominally Orthodox, compared to the less than one percent who are baptized Catholics.
Ryszard Legutko traces the twin developments of liberalism and democracy and shows how, at their precise intersection, the totalitarian impulse rises.