Volume > Issue > What Is to Be Done?

What Is to Be Done?

EDITORIAL

By Dale Vree | March 1997

Those of you who have read our November 1996 editorial know we’ve been wanting to magnify the NEW OXFORD REVIEW’s witness to Catholic orthodoxy at this crucial juncture in Church history by expanding the size of the NOR. We explained that we need to raise at least $57,000 — a bare-minimum figure — by January 31 to accomplish that goal, and we left the matter in your good hands.

Well, January 31 has come and gone. So, what is the verdict?

The verdict is: a big question mark. No verdict! We have not reached our goal, but we’re close, so close.

We could just say: “Sorry, folks, we didn’t reach the goal. We won’t increase the number of pages in the NOR, because it’s just too risky to do so with insufficient funding. That’s that. We’ll just put the moneys raised into paying bills and intensifying our search for new subscribers, exactly as we said we’d do in the event we didn’t reach our goal.”

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

Letters to the Editor: September 2004

Pets Denied Holy Communion... Animal Piety... Staging Apparitions... Are We to Have No Heroes?... Scott Hahn Replies to Edward O'Neill... Lies, Libel and Sin... more

Letters to the Editor: June 2015

The First to Finish the Thought... Bradford the Bipolar... Found: A Divine Warrant... Approval for the Piously Correct... Parsing the Patrimony... Traversing the Boundaries... Why They Aren't Rebuked... For the Love of Paper

Bookmark: October 2003

Reviews of Mystics and Miracles: True Stories of Lives Touched by God by Bert Ghezzi... Ignatius Study Bible: The Gospel of Luke commentary by Scott Hahn and Curtis Mitch...