Volume > Issue > Why the United Methodist Bishops' Stance Against the War on Terrorism Is Incoherent

Why the United Methodist Bishops’ Stance Against the War on Terrorism Is Incoherent

PEACE BEGINS IN THE WOMB

By Peter R. McGuire | March 2002
The Rev. Peter R. McGuire is an ordained Elder in the United Methodist Church, and currently serves Center United Methodist Church in Catawba, North Carolina. He is the author of the forthcoming book The Fruit of the Vine: A History of Methodism in the Southern Piedmont, and helped edit the 1999 volume Theology From the Belly of the Whale.

On November 9, 2001, the Council of Bishops of the United Methodist Church released a pastoral letter to the membership condemning the war on terrorism. This condemnation came in the form of the following sentences: “We, your bishops, believe that violence in all of its forms and expressions is contrary to God’s purpose for the world. Violence creates fear, desperation, hopelessness and instability.” Ultimately, this was an attempt by the bishops to be prophetic, and while it is honorable, their letter is problematic.

According to the Book of Discipline 2000, the constitution of the United Methodist Church, the first duty of a United Methodist bishop is to “guard the faith, order, liturgy, doctrine, and discipline of the Church.” The pastoral letter of November 9 borders on a dereliction of duty as defined by the Book of Discipline 2000. I say this because the bishops call for a pacifist response to the violence committed by the guilty on September 11, while encouraging violence against innocents in the womb. Through a close reading of the writings of John Wesley, Methodism’s founder, and church tradition, I will show that the Council of Bishops has strayed from both, thus moving the denomination increasingly into the position of false prophecy.

John Wesley on War

The heart of the November 9 pastoral letter quoted above is this sentence, “We, your bishops, believe that violence in all of its forms and expressions is contrary to God’s purpose for the world.” This position is not in keeping with Wesley’s own position.

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

Thou Shalt Not Do Nuclear Murder, Nor Intend To

Finnis, Boyle, and Grisez build an extra­ordinarily strong case for unilat­eral nuclear disarmament, and on Just War grounds.

Unilateral Nuclear Disarmament & Being 'Squeezed Out Like a Lemon'

Christians are called by Finnis, Boyle, and Grisez to avoid any co­operation with our nuclear deterrent, just as we must avoid any cooperation with the abortion in­dustry.

Why the United Methodist Bishops' Stance Against the War on Terrorism Is Incoherent

The same church Fathers who condemned war also condemned abortion. Here the moral credibility of the Methodist bishops collapses.