Volume > Issue > What Is to Be Done?

What Is to Be Done?

EDITORIAL

By Dale Vree | March 1997

Those of you who have read our November 1996 editorial know we’ve been wanting to magnify the NEW OXFORD REVIEW’s witness to Catholic orthodoxy at this crucial juncture in Church history by expanding the size of the NOR. We explained that we need to raise at least $57,000 — a bare-minimum figure — by January 31 to accomplish that goal, and we left the matter in your good hands.

Well, January 31 has come and gone. So, what is the verdict?

The verdict is: a big question mark. No verdict! We have not reached our goal, but we’re close, so close.

We could just say: “Sorry, folks, we didn’t reach the goal. We won’t increase the number of pages in the NOR, because it’s just too risky to do so with insufficient funding. That’s that. We’ll just put the moneys raised into paying bills and intensifying our search for new subscribers, exactly as we said we’d do in the event we didn’t reach our goal.”

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

Letters to the Editor: January-February 1984

Standing Up for the Helpless... Perplexed & Disappointed... State of Confusion... Science Presupposes Faith... Ill-Conceived & Trivial... Battle Lines Shifting... Farewell!... Rejoicing... The Luxury of Infighting... Sorry... Delighted

Uncle Ted’s Long Shadow

Apart from the possible connection to Francis’s old pal McCarrick, McElroy is basically a Francis clone. He’s parroted the Pope’s pet projects at nearly every turn.

False Savior

The expense of maintaining our own illusions of godliness must finally crush our spirits or turn us back to God.