What Is to Be Done?
EDITORIAL
Those of you who have read our November 1996 editorial know we’ve been wanting to magnify the NEW OXFORD REVIEW’s witness to Catholic orthodoxy at this crucial juncture in Church history by expanding the size of the NOR. We explained that we need to raise at least $57,000 — a bare-minimum figure — by January 31 to accomplish that goal, and we left the matter in your good hands.
Well, January 31 has come and gone. So, what is the verdict?
The verdict is: a big question mark. No verdict! We have not reached our goal, but we’re close, so close.
We could just say: “Sorry, folks, we didn’t reach the goal. We won’t increase the number of pages in the NOR, because it’s just too risky to do so with insufficient funding. That’s that. We’ll just put the moneys raised into paying bills and intensifying our search for new subscribers, exactly as we said we’d do in the event we didn’t reach our goal.”
You May Also Enjoy
Language should reflect reality. If it doesn’t, what possible limits could be placed on misleading, manipulative language?
Converts' stories of their pasts would be enhanced by explicit avowals of where the Holy Spirit seems to be pointing them.
The Nature of Evil... Suprised By Attacks... A Failure to Perceive... Pastoral Junk... A Positive View of Phenomenology... Racism & Evolution... Have a Little Patience... Much More Gained... and more