The Relevance of Riches & Poverty
CHRIST & NEIGHBOR
“The Gospel seems to treat riches and poverty as irrelevant.” This is the opinion of Michael Novak, as expressed in his book The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism.
Compare this statement with the following four parables or statements of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. I give him the full title because the Gospel takes its authority from him who has the right and authority to rebuke, command, judge, punish, and reward. So what Novak means is, “Jesus Christ seems to treat riches and poverty as irrelevant.” But consider:
(1) The parable of the rich man whose barns were not big enough to hold his crops. He tore them down and built larger ones and said to his soul, “Soul, you have ample goods laid up for many years; take your ease, eat, drink, be merry.” But God said to him, “Fool! This night your soul is required of you.” And Jesus adds, “So is he who lays up treasure for himself and is not rich toward God” (Lk. 12:15-21). Riches and poverty irrelevant?
(2) The terrible story of Dives and Lazarus. Dives (Latin for “the rich one”) is what tradition has called him, but Jesus said only, “There was a rich man.” St. Gregory the Great makes the excellent point, “In common life the names of the rich are better known than those of the poor. How comes it then that when our Lord has to speak of both, he names the poor man and not the rich? The answer is that God knows and approves the humble but does not know the proud.”
Enjoyed reading this?
READ MORE! GET A FREE 7 DAY TRIALSUBSCRIBE TODAY
You May Also Enjoy
So, what’s a middle-class Catholic bag-lady? A woman who by background and profession belongs to…
The popular consensus method, like so much of modern life and culture, has its roots in 18th-century romanticism, and in Rousseau.
How else to think of drug use — by anyone, living anywhere — as but the most obvious evidence of nihilism, of despair?