Religious Freedom: What Is the Catholic Teaching?
RECONCILIATION OF OLD AND NEW?
I was pleased to find in the October 1998 NEW OXFORD REVIEW an article entitled “Why Vatican II’s Declaration on Religious Liberty Does Not Violate Catholic Tradition” by Andrew Tardiff, for the conciliar teaching and traditional Catholic teaching seem to be in conflict, and I would like to be persuaded that the conflict is resolvable. Tardiff’s article didn’t persuade me.
The issues are as follows: The traditional teaching is that in a Catholic society the state may prohibit public worship by non-Catholic religions, the publication of heretical books, the public teaching of heresy, and other public actions that threaten the faith and salvation of the citizens. (For brevity, I will use the phrase “public teaching of error” or “public expression of error” to cover all these types of action.) The Vatican II document Dignitatis Humanae (DH) appears to reverse this teaching.
The Vatican Council declares that the human person has a right to religious freedom. Freedom of this kind means that all men should be immune from coercion on the part of individuals, social groups and every human power so that, within due limits, nobody is forced to act against his convictions in religious matters in private or in public, alone or in associations with others (n. 2, emphasis added).
It states that human dignity requires that people be able to express publicly those religious beliefs that they sincerely hold, whatever the orthodoxy of those beliefs.
You May Also Enjoy
Old Catholicism originated in an 18th-century schism within the illegal but tolerated Catholic Church in the officially Calvinist Netherlands.
Psychology does not live up to expectations of theoretical discussion. Catholic doctrine is sound and actually “fills gaps” left by psychology.
Consciously removing ourselves from the world of distractions and the din of destructive gossip allows the silent Word of God to speak deeply in our hearts.