Religious Freedom: What Is the Catholic Teaching?
RECONCILIATION OF OLD AND NEW?
I was pleased to find in the October 1998 NEW OXFORD REVIEW an article entitled “Why Vatican II’s Declaration on Religious Liberty Does Not Violate Catholic Tradition” by Andrew Tardiff, for the conciliar teaching and traditional Catholic teaching seem to be in conflict, and I would like to be persuaded that the conflict is resolvable. Tardiff’s article didn’t persuade me.
The issues are as follows: The traditional teaching is that in a Catholic society the state may prohibit public worship by non-Catholic religions, the publication of heretical books, the public teaching of heresy, and other public actions that threaten the faith and salvation of the citizens. (For brevity, I will use the phrase “public teaching of error” or “public expression of error” to cover all these types of action.) The Vatican II document Dignitatis Humanae (DH) appears to reverse this teaching.
The Vatican Council declares that the human person has a right to religious freedom. Freedom of this kind means that all men should be immune from coercion on the part of individuals, social groups and every human power so that, within due limits, nobody is forced to act against his convictions in religious matters in private or in public, alone or in associations with others (n. 2, emphasis added).
It states that human dignity requires that people be able to express publicly those religious beliefs that they sincerely hold, whatever the orthodoxy of those beliefs.
Enjoyed reading this?
READ MORE! REGISTER TODAYSUBSCRIBE
You May Also Enjoy
A review of A Bitter Trial: Evelyn Waugh and John Carmel Cardinal Heenan on the Liturgical Changes
Fr. William Virtue concludes “it has been the constant teaching of the Church that there is a serious obligation of maternal nursing.”
Conservatives must realize that placing human dignity at the center of their political programs may increasingly involve rejecting the vox populi.