Lumps, Bumps & Meditation
Rarely do we encounter anything of interest in the letters section of the local Oakland Tribune. But our eyes were drawn to a letter in the June 19 edition, titled, “They’re Perverting Our Language,” from one Michael Stearns of Oakland.
Stearns takes exception to a term that appeared in a May 28 Tribune article on urban traffic blight. The article lauds the installation on certain residential streets in nearby Fremont, Calif., of specially designed speed bumps — “speed lumps,” as they are otherwise known — which have gaps in them that allow emergency vehicles to pass over them without slowing down. Or, as the article’s author calls them, “traffic-calming devices.” It was this obfuscation, used repeatedly in the article, that exercised Stearns’s ire.
Not only does it sound ridiculous, but the use of the term “traffic-calming devices” alters one’s understanding of the function of speed lumps. Whereas the function of speed lumps is to reduce the danger of speeding vehicles, the function of “traffic-calming devices” is to soothe the high-strung motorist. Residential safety is out, relaxation is in. Next, Stearns quips, we’ll be calling traffic lights “meditation moments.”
Word-bending of this type has run rampant: Used cars are now “pre-owned,” rappers and pop stars are “artists,” pornography is “adult entertainment,” and abortion is a “health care need.” Certainly you, dear reader, could have no trouble coming up with your own examples. The effects of this linguistic re-ordering of priorities, as Stearns declares, are far-reaching: “Ever the long id of Freud reaches into the psyche of modern man, rendering common sense impotent, language corrupted and public dialogue tongue-tied by psychobabble pap.” We couldn’t have said it better ourselves! Although this is not a phenomenon limited to the print media, Stearns takes the Tribune writers and editors to task: “As professional wordsmiths of the language, isn’t it part of the newspaper’s mission to cut through the cant of policy wonks and muzzy-mouthed public officials in order to call a spade a spade?” Just so. Meditate on that, Mr. Editor!
Enjoyed reading this?
READ MORE! REGISTER TODAYSUBSCRIBE
You May Also Enjoy
Can dictionaries engender controversy? They certainly can in England — from Dr. Johnson’s definition of…
When we firmly reject using the language crafted by the ideologues of modernity, we strike a blow for sanity.
Promiscuous fuzzing of images and programmatic neutering of prayers