Volume > Issue > Briefly Reviewed: January-February 2019

Briefly Reviewed: January-February 2019

The Knights Templar at War 1120-1312

By Paul Hill

Publisher: Pen and Sword Books

Pages: 246

Price: $32.95

Review Author: Brian Welter

The Knights Templar represented the pinnacle of medieval society by combining knightly bravery and brotherhood with monastic spiritual depth and steadfastness. Paul Hill’s The Knights Templar at War 1120-1312 offers a wide-ranging look at the military context in which the order operated and its place at the forefront of crusading warfare. The mood Hill creates is exemplified by the words of Bishop Thomas Olivier of Paderborn, Germany, who actively participated in the Fifth Crusade: “The army of the Temple, which is usually first to assemble, was last to retreat. Therefore, when it arrived last at our ramparts…it stayed without so that it might bring those who were before it back within the walls as soon as possible.” Of Olivier’s description Hill expounds, “Encapsulated within this brief statement is all that was good about the Templars at war. Early preparedness, quick reactions, steadfast commitment, fighting to the last, huge personal sacrifice and devotion to the protection of fellow Christians.”

Hill describes important battles and the order’s social and military milieu. The weaving together of needs both warrior and religious was codified; for example, the Templar’s Hierarchical Statutes specify, “The Master [of the order] should have four horses and one Chaplain brother, one clerk with three horses, one sergeant brother with two horses, one gentleman valet with one horse to carry his shield and lance.” Hill also includes sketches and photos of building floor plans and other architecture, battle formation, and common images of the military order (such as their battlefield standards), which greatly aid in understanding the attraction of the Knights to medieval society.

As promised in the book’s title, Hill is at his best when analyzing military conditions and tactics. Hill repeatedly reminds readers of the harsh conditions of the Near East and Iberian Peninsula, including not only battlefield realities but logistical practicalities, such as the vast quantities of hay and water needed for the knights’ horses and beasts of burden. Hill quotes Jacques de Molay’s sober if unromantic hesitation to rush headlong into a crusade to recapture the Holy Land after the fall of Acre in 1291: “The land itself is so unhealthy and harsh that it would be a miracle if a force of 4,000 strong, healthy knights could muster 500 survivors at the end of the year.” More such citations from major actors and chroniclers of the time would have been welcome.

Throughout the book, small boxed asides provide background facts on various individuals and groups. For instance, the brief aside on Gualdim Pais, Master of Portugal from 1157 to 1195, reads, “The founder of the Templar castle and city of Tomar…. His stalwart defense of Christian Portugal throughout his long career won him admiration even after the Templars were disbanded.” Hill’s coverage of a large quantity of information is the flip-side of the book’s weaknesses: political aspects are given only superficial attention; not much is learned about the leaders of the Templars, aside from the last — Jacques de Molay, burned at the stake by the French king in 1314 — and most individuals mentioned seem but bit players in a sweeping narrative. Moreover, Hill gives only cursory attention to the theological issues and religious devotion that led to the crusades and military orders in the first place.

Notwithstanding these lacunae, Hill piques one’s curiosity in the medieval intermixing of the sacred and the profane and whets readers’ appetites for more on the Knights Templar and on the crusades in general.

The Fragility of Order: Catholic Reflections on Turbulent Times

By George Weigel

Publisher: Ignatius

Pages: 223

Price: $24.95

Review Author: Timothy D. Lusch

Adorning the cover of George Weigel’s Fragility of Order is Pieter Bruegel the Elder’s harrowing depiction of St. Michael the Archangel driving Lucifer’s rebellious angels from Heaven. This primeval disruption of divine order engendered our exile from Eden and subsequent search for human order in a chaotic world. It is also the archetype by which we must understand order — and its disintegration in many areas — in our own day. The book’s title adds its own dynamic tension, for order (family, Church, government), despite its durability, is fragile. It requires individual virtue and communal vigilance. It is a gift but never a given.

Existential threats to order, such as the twin tyrannies of individualism and totalitarianism, have wreaked devastation on our present age. These threats demonstrate that the preservation and renewal of order neither begin nor end with politics. Preservation of order is at its core a religious endeavor that undergirds culture and politics and — as Weigel makes clear — should be informed by, and be a reflection of, the divine order.

The Fragility of Order is a collection of 13 essays Weigel presented as lectures or published in magazines. At first glance, the essays appear disparate and unconnected. The book begins with an essay called “The Great War Revisited” and ends with a discussion of the Poverello of Assisi entitled “Evangelical Churchmanship.” In lesser hands, any connection might be muddled or lost, but Weigel writes crisply and with purpose; he knows what he wants to say.

Connecting the essays are Weigel’s observations on the possibilities of order in America, the world, and the Catholic Church. And while each has challenges particular to its role in the life of man, the necessity and continuity — by no means certainty — of order is Weigel’s preoccupation. His concern is “one of diagnosis, not prescription.” Though Weigel does offer suggestions, he is careful to avoid the siren call of plans and programs that mars so many books on our cultural moment. The remedy for a civilization heaving and creaking under the weight of distorted understandings of human freedom and the inevitable accompaniment of the will to power is not found in a PowerPoint presentation.

Thematically speaking, Weigel ranges territory found in other recent books. Like Archbishop Charles J. Chaput in Strangers in a Strange Land, he is concerned with the future of American order, especially as it bears upon Christian life and freedom. And like Ross Douthat in To Change the Church, Weigel is troubled by deep rifts in the Church since Vatican II, highlighted by the synods of 2014 and 2015. Weigel swims in deeper currents than Douthat and, as a layman, offers a different perspective than Chaput. But all three authors share the belief that, as Weigel says, the People of God “may have cause for concern” but “no cause for despair.”

Weigel is best at discussing Christianity in the public square. Two essays, “The Importance of Reality Contact” and “A New Great Awakening,” provide trenchant analyses of the moral and cultural fault lines in America. But he doesn’t merely describe how we wandered into this dark wood; he sheds light on the path back. The task is simple but not easy: offering Christian joy to a country hell-bent on human pleasure.

Weigel’s essay on Pope Benedict XVI’s 2006 Regensburg address — a well-reasoned attempt to engage the colliding forces of Islam and a postmodern West — is excellent in correcting the errors of a hysterical media. But Weigel misses the mark by locating the roots of Islamic violence in jihadist ideology. It is the same error that marred his 2009 book Faith, Reason, and the War Against Jihadism. He assumes that jihad of the sword (there are other types) is an aberration or irrational misinterpretation. It is neither. That many Muslims do not wage jihad of the sword does not mean it is not Islamic doctrine. The doctrine is there, waiting to be acted upon.

Weigel further supports his argument by pointing to the irrational violence and “distortions of the Gospel” during the crusades, for which he claims the Church has repented. But it is arguable that Pope St. John Paul II’s “Day of Pardon” in March 2000 was an apology. More significantly, Weigel’s view is not in keeping with crusades scholarship: Jonathan Riley-Smith argues in The Crusades: The Essential Readings that contemporary sources viewed crusading as an act of love, and Christopher Tyerman definitively demonstrates in How to Plan a Crusade that the crusades were rational. Furthermore, Weigel’s hope in an Islamic reckoning with the Enlightenment is misplaced. As Robert Reilly shows in The Closing of the Muslim Mind, that way is shut.

As large an issue as Islam is to the Church, it is a small thing against Weigel’s achievement in this collection of essays.

Enjoyed reading this?



You May Also Enjoy

Regarding the Advice Being Given Prolifers by Certain 'Friendly' Conservatives

In their usual crude, pragmatic way, the politicians seem to be arriving at a rough…

Making Sense of the "Sense of the Faith"

As the Second Vatican Council was winding down in 1965, the Council Fathers turned their…

Is Divine Mercy Sunday Liturgically Correct?

When Jesus first requested that St. Faustina work toward establishing the Feast of Mercy on…